From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] Refine memblock API
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:17:28 -0300
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5D2uzR6Sz1QnX3G-Ce_juxU-0PO_vBZX+nR1mpQB8s8-w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1548057848-15136-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com>
 <CAHCN7x+Jv7yGPoB0Gm=TJ30ObLJduw2XomHkd++KqFEURYQcGg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOMZO5A_U4aYC4XZXK1r9JaLg-eRdXy8m6z4GatQp62rK4HZ6A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHCN7xJdzEppn8-74SvzACsA25bUHGdV7v=CfS08xzSi59Z2uw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-snps-arc-bounces+gla-linux-snps-arc=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHCN7xJdzEppn8-74SvzACsA25bUHGdV7v=CfS08xzSi59Z2uw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-snps-arc>,
 <mailto:linux-snps-arc-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-snps-arc/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-snps-arc-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc>,
 <mailto:linux-snps-arc-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: "linux-snps-arc" <linux-snps-arc-bounces@lists.infradead.org>
Errors-To: linux-snps-arc-bounces+gla-linux-snps-arc=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org
To: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>, devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, x86@kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>, Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, Chris Healy <cphealy@gmail.com>, uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 9:17 AM Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> wrote:

> I tried cma=256M and noticed the cma dump at the beginning didn't
> change.  Do we need to setup a reserved-memory node like
> imx6ul-ccimx6ulsom.dtsi did?

I don't think so.

Were you able to identify what was the exact commit that caused such regression?