From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olof Johansson Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] dts: v8500: Cleanups for 3.10 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:50:53 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1366781902-13025-1-git-send-email-linux@prisktech.co.nz> <51785F20.704@prisktech.co.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51785F20.704@prisktech.co.nz> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Tony Prisk Cc: VT8500 Mailing List , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Tony Prisk wrote: > On 24/04/13 17:38, Tony Prisk wrote: >> >> Arnd, Olof, >> >> This is probably a bit late for 3.10 now but its just a bunch of cleanups >> for >> the arch-vt8500 devicetree SoC and board files, and the addition of a new >> dts for the VIA APC8750. >> >> Regards >> Tony P >> >> Tony Prisk (3): >> dts: vt8500: Fix invalid/missing cpu nodes for soc files. >> dts: vt8500: Add devicetree support for WM8750 SoC and APC8750 board >> dts: vt8500: Update serial nodes and disable by default in SoC files >> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 + >> arch/arm/boot/dts/vt8500-bv07.dts | 4 + >> arch/arm/boot/dts/vt8500.dtsi | 29 ++- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8505-ref.dts | 4 + >> arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8505.dtsi | 35 +++- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8650-mid.dts | 4 + >> arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8650.dtsi | 21 +- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8750-apc8750.dts | 30 +++ >> arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8750.dtsi | 355 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8850-w70v2.dts | 4 + >> arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8850.dtsi | 23 ++- >> 11 files changed, 492 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8750-apc8750.dts >> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8750.dtsi >> > Don't worry about this patch series - it looks like we are going back to > 926ejs (rather than changing to 926) so I will send out another request > after the merge window. Ok, it was definitely late for 3.10 anyway. :) We'll merge after -rc1 if you send a fresh request then. -Olof