From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94221C7E09C for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 20:40:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE85247F4 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 20:40:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="Ohgf2p7R" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728884AbfLMShS (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Dec 2019 13:37:18 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-f47.google.com ([209.85.166.47]:33882 "EHLO mail-io1-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728900AbfLMShS (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Dec 2019 13:37:18 -0500 Received: by mail-io1-f47.google.com with SMTP id z193so448818iof.1 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 10:37:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8rSTbx4+Xnp8FvEJgiPQ5fFPbX8PvFRdBprtRWfCWCQ=; b=Ohgf2p7RcDyAO9x+7hqrHkTxJ+a7kT8vOKByrsrMwlsQyfiqsofPMz6dlNEaH2kFr/ 30OXQgmqBqqpNadNXtss0bPV2ZVcHODsCXvhDzcMWmbv1s3KgrYiRRQusO6bkbFDRp5r LKvKMn4BTmDY7od/XhpsXT23xIipONjzb6tpmba5Yg7opdrxn9JbPVo+73idK9kGsIF2 nxFDLQAEjalQhqtduuADtXitKUuXf7FWRkHCJElsAxtG+37Ox7MhGWEh9v8dKVoLChhH vtTC4mmQqcAXBoutRncx9v8ysca09wIVNJ/BhTFVjArRy8gBLIIC18A4DbY6RDDKDnlb wsYg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8rSTbx4+Xnp8FvEJgiPQ5fFPbX8PvFRdBprtRWfCWCQ=; b=p00FBOvGko8FBZ5iah6GnC2MFXTHussrNPohjU470ijcQqsPSVuc8D6shZJ27Ipx1d dI8WJcrucN+CWUdMShyeRlzOkJhB3tgFjb4gFubBM4dQen6A7P2UDq+5ZIp/HIb8J3RA lcqnMNpbsg9A8tOBcA4CEaIHSiq8WjUeFfhi54eVIbSsJVzahcfkmgeJsvjitphYaGrt qDgfx+BPHdDVuJ40/uNg7H0LMYfWRt4bKXokwJaCEEtxK1eTG2xQqw0sPxvarPjqDVZy ePPpARO122mb9QsCbMlzIW1GDWNNqDFXR2wI0jOcn4AG0ioE2/HMx4tPfagsEWGxSXOZ 0A3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWCRIVt2q2TxUnQfpv0HX2Zs+0KxVqfeW+vIZha3wJaXkFz4qZx Pg+gL7l5/ezsvhQQN4o68i9CQN4M0JVvPIzYc9ds3A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwmEGW+SCoK781R1wHEyeHBJdMspwk5PrOmp57kqjQ+5c6ggfMA1Zq5gVwxNfGgc4rjMK4/bvTYtO3f/Xhf1Jc= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:da0d:: with SMTP id x13mr7973581ioj.123.1576262237318; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 10:37:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191120034451.30102-1-Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> In-Reply-To: <20191120034451.30102-1-Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> From: Olof Johansson Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 10:37:06 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 00/12] PCI: Recode Mobiveil driver and add PCIe Gen4 driver for NXP Layerscape SoCs To: "Z.q. Hou" , "bhelgaas@google.com" Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "l.subrahmanya@mobiveil.co.in" , "shawnguo@kernel.org" , "m.karthikeyan@mobiveil.co.in" , Leo Li , "lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "will.deacon@arm.com" , "andrew.murray@arm.com" , Mingkai Hu , "M.h. Lian" , Xiaowei Bao Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi! On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 7:45 PM Z.q. Hou wrote: > > From: Hou Zhiqiang > > This patch set is to recode the Mobiveil driver and add > PCIe support for NXP Layerscape series SoCs integrated > Mobiveil's PCIe Gen4 controller. Can we get a respin for this on top of the 5.5 merge window material? Given that it's a bunch of refactorings, many of them don't apply on top of the material that was merged. I'd love to see these go in sooner rather than later so I can start getting -next running on ls2160a here. -Olof