From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Loren
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] base: power: Add generic OF-based power domain look-up
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 08:19:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFqK1JqxeJ_L_bzduixRLGA5m_FFPq_of2r6y0aCpS7z9A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1393862536-9842-2-git-send-email-tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
On 3 March 2014 17:02, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:
> This patch introduces generic code to perform power domain look-up using
> device tree and automatically bind devices to their power domains.
> Generic device tree binding is introduced to specify power domains of
> devices in their device tree nodes.
>
> Backwards compatibility with legacy Samsung-specific power domain
> bindings is provided, but for now the new code is not compiled when
> CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS is selected to avoid collision with legacy code. This
> will change as soon as Exynos power domain code gets converted to use
> the generic framework in further patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt | 51 ++++
> drivers/base/power/domain.c | 298 +++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/pm_domain.h | 46 ++++
> kernel/power/Kconfig | 4 +
> 4 files changed, 399 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..93be5d9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> +* Generic power domains
> +
> +System on chip designs are often divided into multiple power domains that
> +can be used for power gating of selected IP blocks for power saving by
> +reduced leakage current.
> +
> +This device tree binding can be used to bind power domain consumer devices
> +with their power domains provided by power domain providers. A power domain
> +provider can be represented by any node in the device tree and can provide
> +one or more power domains. A consumer node can refer to the provider by
> +a phandle and a set of phandle arguments (so called power domain specifier)
> +of length specified by #power-domain-cells property in the power domain
> +provider node.
> +
> +==Power domain providers==
> +
> +Required properties:
> + - #power-domain-cells : Number of cells in a power domain specifier;
> + Typically 0 for nodes representing a single power domain and 1 for nodes
> + providing multiple power domains (e.g. power controllers), but can be
> + any value as specified by device tree binding documentation of particular
> + provider.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> + power: power-controller@12340000 {
> + compatible = "foo,power-controller";
> + reg = <0x12340000 0x1000>;
> + #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> + };
> +
> +The node above defines a power controller that is a power domain provider
> +and expects one cell as its phandle argument.
> +
> +==Power domain consumers==
> +
> +Required properties:
> + - power-domain : A phandle and power domain specifier as defined by bindings
> + of power controller specified by phandle.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> + leaky-device@12350000 {
> + compatible = "foo,i-leak-current";
> + reg = <0x12350000 0x1000>;
> + power-domain = <&power 0>;
> + };
> +
> +The node above defines a typical power domain consumer device, which is located
> +inside power domain with index 0 of power controller represented by node with
> +label "power".
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> index dc127e5..006b455 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> @@ -3,12 +3,16 @@
> *
> * Copyright (C) 2011 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>, Renesas Electronics Corp.
> *
> + * Support for Device Tree based power domain providers:
> + * Copyright (C) 2014 Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
> + *
> * This file is released under the GPLv2.
> */
>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
> #include <linux/pm_qos.h>
> @@ -2177,3 +2181,297 @@ void pm_genpd_init(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
> list_add(&genpd->gpd_list_node, &gpd_list);
> mutex_unlock(&gpd_list_lock);
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_OF
Do we need a new config for this? Can't we just use CONFIG_OF?
> +/*
> + * DEVICE TREE BASED POWER DOMAIN PROVIDERS
> + *
> + * The code below implements generic device tree based power domain providers
> + * that bind device tree nodes with generic power domains registered in the
> + * system.
> + *
> + * Any driver that registers generic power domains and need to support binding
> + * of devices to these domains is supposed to register a power domain provider,
> + * which maps a power domain specifier retrieved from device tree to a power
> + * domain.
> + *
> + * Two simple mapping functions have been provided for convenience:
> + * - of_genpd_xlate_simple() for 1:1 device tree node to domain mapping,
> + * - of_genpd_xlate_onecell() for mapping of multiple domains per node
> + * by index.
> + */
> +
> +/**
> + * struct of_genpd_provider - Power domain provider registration structure
> + * @link: Entry in global list of domain providers
> + * @node: Pointer to device tree node of domain provider
> + * @xlate: Provider-specific xlate callback mapping a set of specifier cells
> + * into a power domain.
> + * @data: context pointer to be passed into @xlate callback
> + */
> +struct of_genpd_provider {
> + struct list_head link;
> +
> + struct device_node *node;
> + genpd_xlate_t xlate;
> + void *data;
> +};
> +
> +/* List of registered power domain providers. */
> +static LIST_HEAD(of_genpd_providers);
> +/* Mutex to protect the list above. */
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(of_genpd_mutex);
> +
> +/**
> + * of_genpd_xlate_simple() - Xlate function for direct node-domain mapping
> + * @genpdspec: OF phandle args to map into a power domain
> + * @data: xlate function private data - pointer to struct generic_pm_domain
> + *
> + * This is a generic xlate function that can be used to model power domains
> + * that have their own device tree nodes. The private data of xlate function
> + * needs to be a valid pointer to struct generic_pm_domain.
> + */
> +struct generic_pm_domain *of_genpd_xlate_simple(
> + struct of_phandle_args *genpdspec,
> + void *data)
> +{
> + if (genpdspec->args_count != 0)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + return data;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_genpd_xlate_simple);
> +
> +/**
> + * of_genpd_xlate_onecell() - Xlate function for providers using single index.
> + * @genpdspec: OF phandle args to map into a power domain
> + * @data: xlate function private data - pointer to struct genpd_onecell_data
> + *
> + * This is a generic xlate function that can be used to model simple power
> + * domain controllers that have one device tree node and provide multiple
> + * power domains. A single cell is used as an index to an array of power
> + * domains specified in genpd_onecell_data struct when registering the
> + * provider.
> + */
> +struct generic_pm_domain *of_genpd_xlate_onecell(
> + struct of_phandle_args *genpdspec,
> + void *data)
> +{
> + struct genpd_onecell_data *genpd_data = data;
> + unsigned int idx = genpdspec->args[0];
> +
> + if (genpdspec->args_count != 1)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> + if (idx >= genpd_data->domain_num) {
> + pr_err("%s: invalid domain index %d\n", __func__, idx);
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
> +
> + return genpd_data->domains[idx];
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_genpd_xlate_onecell);
> +
> +/**
> + * of_genpd_add_provider() - Register a domain provider for a node
> + * @np: Device node pointer associated with domain provider.
> + * @xlate: Callback for decoding domain from phandle arguments.
> + * @data: Context pointer for @genpd_src_get callback.
> + */
> +int of_genpd_add_provider(struct device_node *np, genpd_xlate_t xlate,
> + void *data)
> +{
> + struct of_genpd_provider *cp;
> +
> + cp = kzalloc(sizeof(*cp), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!cp)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + cp->node = of_node_get(np);
> + cp->data = data;
> + cp->xlate = xlate;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&of_genpd_mutex);
> + list_add(&cp->link, &of_genpd_providers);
> + mutex_unlock(&of_genpd_mutex);
> + pr_debug("Added domain provider from %s\n", np->full_name);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_genpd_add_provider);
> +
> +/**
> + * of_genpd_del_provider() - Remove a previously registered domain provider
> + * @np: Device node pointer associated with domain provider
> + */
> +void of_genpd_del_provider(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> + struct of_genpd_provider *cp;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&of_genpd_mutex);
> + list_for_each_entry(cp, &of_genpd_providers, link) {
> + if (cp->node == np) {
> + list_del(&cp->link);
> + of_node_put(cp->node);
> + kfree(cp);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&of_genpd_mutex);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_genpd_del_provider);
> +
> +/* See of_genpd_get_from_provider(). */
> +static struct generic_pm_domain *__of_genpd_get_from_provider(
> + struct of_phandle_args *genpdspec)
> +{
> + struct of_genpd_provider *provider;
> + struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> +
> + /* Check if we have such a provider in our array */
> + list_for_each_entry(provider, &of_genpd_providers, link) {
> + if (provider->node == genpdspec->np)
> + genpd = provider->xlate(genpdspec, provider->data);
> + if (!IS_ERR(genpd))
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return genpd;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * of_genpd_get_from_provider() - Look-up power domain
> + * @genpdspec: OF phandle args to use for look-up
> + *
> + * Looks for domain provider under node specified by @genpdspec and if found
> + * uses xlate function of the provider to map phandle args to a power domain.
> + *
> + * Returns a valid pointer to struct generic_pm_domain on success or ERR_PTR()
> + * on failure.
> + */
> +static struct generic_pm_domain *of_genpd_get_from_provider(
> + struct of_phandle_args *genpdspec)
> +{
> + struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&of_genpd_mutex);
> + genpd = __of_genpd_get_from_provider(genpdspec);
> + mutex_unlock(&of_genpd_mutex);
> +
> + return genpd;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * DEVICE<->DOMAIN BINDING USING DEVICE TREE LOOK-UP
> + *
> + * The code below registers a notifier for platform bus devices'
> + * BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER events and tries to attach devices to their power
> + * domains by looking them up using Device Tree.
> + *
> + * Similarly in BUS_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER the device is detached from its
> + * domain, since it no longer supports runtime PM without any driver bound
> + * to it.
> + *
> + * Both generic and legacy Samsung-specific DT bindings are supported to
> + * keep backwards compatibility with existing DTBs.
> + */
> +
> +/**
> + * genpd_bind_domain - Bind device to its power domain using Device Tree.
> + * @dev: Device to bind to its power domain.
> + *
> + * Tries to parse power domain specifier from device's OF node and if succeeds
> + * attaches the device to retrieved power domain.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success or negative error code otherwise.
> + */
> +int genpd_bind_domain(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct of_phandle_args pd_args;
> + struct generic_pm_domain *pd;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!dev->of_node)
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "power-domain",
> + "#power-domain-cells", 0, &pd_args);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + if (ret != -ENOENT)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * Try legacy Samsung-specific bindings
> + * (for backwards compatibility of DT ABI)
> + */
> + pd_args.args_count = 0;
> + pd_args.np = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node,
> + "samsung,power-domain", 0);
> + if (!pd_args.np)
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + pd = of_genpd_get_from_provider(&pd_args);
> + if (IS_ERR(pd)) {
> + if (PTR_ERR(pd) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to find power domain: %ld\n",
> + PTR_ERR(pd));
> + return PTR_ERR(pd);
> + }
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "adding to power domain %s\n", pd->name);
> +
> + while (1) {
> + ret = pm_genpd_add_device(pd, dev);
> + if (ret != -EAGAIN)
> + break;
> + cond_resched();
> + }
> +
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to add to power domain %s: %d",
> + pd->name, ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + pm_genpd_dev_need_restore(dev, true);
So this will reflect the device as being inactive, which I think is
the wrong approach.
Usually we should expect drivers that's being probed successfully to
leave their devices in active state, right?
Kind regards
Ulf Hansson
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * genpd_unbind_domain - Unbind device from its power domain.
> + * @dev: Device to unbind from its power domain.
> + *
> + * Unbinds device from power domain previously bound to it.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success or negative error code otherwise.
> + */
> +int genpd_unbind_domain(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct generic_pm_domain *pd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!dev->of_node || IS_ERR(pd))
> + return 0;
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "removing from power domain %s\n", pd->name);
> +
> + while (1) {
> + ret = pm_genpd_remove_device(pd, dev);
> + if (ret != -EAGAIN)
> + break;
> + cond_resched();
> + }
> +
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to remove from power domain %s: %d",
> + pd->name, ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /* Check if domain can be powered off after removing this device. */
> + genpd_queue_power_off_work(pd);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_domain.h b/include/linux/pm_domain.h
> index 7c1d252..04473d4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_domain.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_domain.h
> @@ -310,4 +310,50 @@ static inline void pm_genpd_syscore_poweron(struct device *dev)
> pm_genpd_syscore_switch(dev, false);
> }
>
> +/* OF power domain providers */
> +struct of_device_id;
> +
> +struct genpd_onecell_data {
> + struct generic_pm_domain **domains;
> + unsigned int domain_num;
> +};
> +
> +typedef struct generic_pm_domain *(*genpd_xlate_t)(struct of_phandle_args *args,
> + void *data);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_OF
> +int of_genpd_add_provider(struct device_node *np, genpd_xlate_t xlate,
> + void *data);
> +void of_genpd_del_provider(struct device_node *np);
> +
> +struct generic_pm_domain *of_genpd_xlate_simple(
> + struct of_phandle_args *genpdspec,
> + void *data);
> +struct generic_pm_domain *of_genpd_xlate_onecell(
> + struct of_phandle_args *genpdspec,
> + void *data);
> +
> +int genpd_bind_domain(struct device *dev);
> +int genpd_unbind_domain(struct device *dev);
> +#else /* !CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_OF */
> +static inline int of_genpd_add_provider(struct device_node *np,
> + genpd_xlate_t xlate, void *data)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +static inline void of_genpd_del_provider(struct device_node *np) {}
> +
> +#define of_genpd_xlate_simple NULL
> +#define of_genpd_xlate_onecell NULL
> +
> +static inline int genpd_bind_domain(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +static inline int genpd_unbind_domain(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_OF */
> +
> #endif /* _LINUX_PM_DOMAIN_H */
> diff --git a/kernel/power/Kconfig b/kernel/power/Kconfig
> index 2fac9cc..45aa98e 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/power/Kconfig
> @@ -306,6 +306,10 @@ config PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_RUNTIME
> def_bool y
> depends on PM_RUNTIME && PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
>
> +config PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_OF
> + def_bool y
> + depends on PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS && OF && !ARCH_EXYNOS
> +
> config CPU_PM
> bool
> depends on SUSPEND || CPU_IDLE
> --
> 1.9.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-05 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-03 16:02 [PATCH v2 00/11] Generic Device Tree based power domain look-up Tomasz Figa
2014-03-03 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] base: power: Add generic OF-based " Tomasz Figa
2014-03-04 18:23 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-03-05 11:53 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-03-05 4:24 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-05 6:41 ` Rob Herring
2014-03-05 7:19 ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2014-03-05 11:47 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-03-05 12:44 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-03-05 18:37 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-03-14 23:07 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-03-19 23:13 ` Sören Brinkmann
2014-03-19 23:16 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-04-03 12:16 ` Ulf Hansson
[not found] ` <CAPDyKFoxTAHyX7SQAMsvt=OttHs22oMSB8XrRUDDJ06qO0Fc2w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-03 12:30 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-04-03 13:32 ` Ulf Hansson
2014-03-03 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] drivercore: Bind/unbind power domain on probe/remove Tomasz Figa
2014-03-04 18:29 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-03-04 19:17 ` Philipp Zabel
2014-03-05 4:26 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-05 7:22 ` Ulf Hansson
2014-03-03 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] ARM: exynos: Move to generic power domain bindings Tomasz Figa
2014-03-05 16:15 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-03-05 16:20 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-03-07 13:04 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-03-03 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Use name field of generic_pm_domain Tomasz Figa
2014-03-05 4:28 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-03 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Add always_on field to s3c64xx_pm_domain struct Tomasz Figa
2014-03-05 4:28 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-03 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Add pwr_stat bit for domain G Tomasz Figa
2014-03-05 4:28 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-03 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Add device tree based power domain instantiation Tomasz Figa
[not found] ` <1393862536-9842-8-git-send-email-tomasz.figa-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-05 4:29 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-03 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] ARM: s3c64xx: dt: Enable SoC-level power management Tomasz Figa
[not found] ` <1393862536-9842-9-git-send-email-tomasz.figa-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-05 4:30 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <1393862536-9842-1-git-send-email-tomasz.figa-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-03 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] ARM: dts: s3c64xx: Add nodes for power domains Tomasz Figa
2014-03-05 4:31 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-03 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] ARM: dts: s3c64xx: Add node for display controller Tomasz Figa
2014-03-03 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] ARM: dts: s3c6410-mini6410: Add support for LCD screen Tomasz Figa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPDyKFqK1JqxeJ_L_bzduixRLGA5m_FFPq_of2r6y0aCpS7z9A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).