devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
To: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Mateusz Krawczuk <m.krawczuk@partner.samsung.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	cpufreq@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>,
	b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, t.stanislaws@samsung.com,
	devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] ARM: S5PV210: move to common clk framework
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:46:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPtuhTgQ1M7Z3PCFCPVTKT-uY+JE6cGSdbEfJrLMmbRr+C9MZA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <526FD849.9050000@samsung.com>

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> On 10/29/13 04:42, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kukjin, Mike,
>>
>> On Monday 21 of October 2013 05:16:05 Mike Turquette wrote:
>>>
>>> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-10-20 13:51:42)
>>>>
>>>> On 10/20/13 01:03, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Mike, Kukjin, Rafael,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday 24 of September 2013 14:50:06 Mateusz Krawczuk wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch series is the new s5pv210 clock implementation
>>>>>> (using common clk framework).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This implementation is compatible with device tree definition and
>>>>>> board
>>>>>> files.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch series is based on linux-next and has been tested on goni
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> aquila
>>>>>> boards using board file.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since v4:
>>>>>> Corrected mux flags for finpll.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since v3:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Replace s5pv210_clk_register_finpll, by creating mux finpll
>>>>>> with xusbxti and xxti as parrents.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mateusz Krawczuk (3):
>>>>>>     clk: samsung: Add clock driver for s5pc110/s5pv210
>>>>>>     Cpufreq: s5pv210 cpufreq fixes for CCF
>>>>>>     ARM: s5pv210: Migrate clock handling to Common Clock Framework
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    .../bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.txt       |  75 +++
>>>>>>    arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig                      |   9 +
>>>>>>    arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile                     |   4 +-
>>>>>>    arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/common.c                     |  17 +
>>>>>>    arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/common.h                     |  10 +
>>>>>>    arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-goni.c                  |   2 +-
>>>>>>    arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-smdkv210.c              |   2 +-
>>>>>>    arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig                      |   2 +-
>>>>>>    drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile                       |   3 +
>>>>>>    drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s5pv210.c                  | 673
>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
>>>>>>    |   6 +-
>>>>>>    include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.h  | 224 +++++++
>>>>>>    12 files changed, 1019 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>>>    create mode 100644
>>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.txt
>>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s5pv210.c
>>>>>>    create mode 100644
>>>>>> include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.h
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe this series is reasonable to be applied. Could we agree on
>>>>> the tree it would go through and get all tne required acks?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Tomasz
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I agree.
>>>>
>>>> Mike, how do you think the common clk stuff for s5pv210?
>>>
>>>
>>> Clock code looks good to me. Which tree do you want to take it through?
>>
>>
>> Seems like we just missed another kernel release. It's a bit sad that it's
>> happening so often for Samsung patches...
>>
>
> Tomasz, sorry about that, I couldn't end up the stuff before attending ARM
> Kernel Summit, but in my opinion, this series would be merged for upcoming
> merge window via clk tree if Mike is fine because there is no conflicts with
> Samsung tree.
>
> Mike, how do you think? If you're OK, please pick this into your tree with
> my ack.

I'll pull this in later today with your Ack.

Regards,
Mike

>
> Thanks,
> Kukjin

      reply	other threads:[~2013-10-29 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-24 12:50 [PATCH v5 0/3] ARM: S5PV210: move to common clk framework Mateusz Krawczuk
2013-09-24 12:50 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] clk: samsung: Add clock driver for s5pc110/s5pv210 Mateusz Krawczuk
2013-09-24 13:58   ` Sylwester Nawrocki
     [not found]     ` <52419A6E.9020203-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-24 14:26       ` Tomasz Figa
2013-09-24 12:50 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] Cpufreq: s5pv210 cpufreq fixes for CCF Mateusz Krawczuk
2013-09-24 12:50 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] ARM: s5pv210: Migrate clock handling to Common Clock Framework Mateusz Krawczuk
2013-09-24 13:04 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] ARM: S5PV210: move to common clk framework Tomasz Figa
2013-10-19 16:03 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-10-20 20:51   ` Kukjin Kim
2013-10-21 12:16     ` Mike Turquette
2013-10-29 11:42       ` Tomasz Figa
2013-10-29 15:46         ` Kukjin Kim
2013-10-29 17:46           ` Mike Turquette [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPtuhTgQ1M7Z3PCFCPVTKT-uY+JE6cGSdbEfJrLMmbRr+C9MZA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=mturquette@linaro.org \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=m.krawczuk@partner.samsung.com \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
    --cc=t.stanislaws@samsung.com \
    --cc=thomas.abraham@linaro.org \
    --cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).