From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Subject: Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1)) Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 20:18:14 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1370475609.20454.44.camel@localhost> <1370477958.20454.68.camel@localhost> <51B085C6.3000605@gmail.com> <51B19046.5040401@gmail.com> <1370616567.2433.20.camel@jm-desktop> <20130607182608.GV18614@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130607182608.GV18614@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: joem , Linux on small ARM machines , "debian-arm@lists.debian.org" , devicetree-discuss , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ARM Linux Mailing List , "debian-kernel@lists.debian.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Luke Leighton on the other hand is demanding that we no demands have been made, russell: i've informed you of an immovable deadline which will pass beyond which the opportunity being presented is lost. > (Linux kernel > developers) come up with proposals within three days so that Luke can > act .... is *going* to act, regardless of how well people deal with the time limitations and my own communication limitations.... > as a middle man between us and Allwinner, and is .... not ... > blaming the Linux > kernel community for the situation with Allwinner. > > As you seem to have your facts wrong, I can only conclude that you > are also trolling... I hope I'm wrong about that and you've just made > an innocent mistake. please continue to assume that i am making mistakes [under time pressure]: you'd be right. i never understand this word "troll" and i haven't got time to discuss its meaning. greatly appreciated efforts to correct my misunderstandings and mistakes so that i'm properly prepared - ready or not - for the meeting ahead. l.