Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: Add camera clock controller

Luca Weiss
2023-01-27T13:12:55Z

On Fri Jan 27, 2023 at 1:49 PM CET, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 27/01/2023 12:45, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > Can I reference <&camcc TITAN_TOP_GDSC> from itself? I know that having
> > it on is required to turn on at least some clocks (maybe all clocks).
> > But from what I understand how power domains are normally handled, the
> > driver core enables them before the driver is probed, so self
> > referencing wouldn't work.
> >
> > And at least no other SoC upstream references TITAN_TOP_GDSC in camcc.
> >
> > Regards
> > Luca
>
> Doh I meant to say a power-domain to an mmcx a la
>
> power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8250_MMCX>;
> required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
>
> TITAN_TOP should be in your cci and camss dt nodes.

Okay, that makes more sense.

What I don't quite understand is why sm8250 only has MMCX listed there
since downstream has both vdd_mx-supply = <&VDD_MX_LEVEL> and
vdd_mm-supply = <&VDD_MMCX_LEVEL> and both "supplies" are used for
different clocks using .vdd_class

But back to sm6350, downstream has vdd_mx-supply = <&VDD_MX_LEVEL> and
vdd_cx-supply = <&VDD_CX_LEVEL> and like sm8250 uses cx and mx for
different clocks.
Not sure if I should add both, and I guess mainline also currently
doesn't use higher ops for the power domain when higher clock rate is
needed, from what I understand?

>
> ---
> bod