From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (relay9-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B94645EE96; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 09:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.199 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709717654; cv=none; b=a9SGI9mZKM0b4E4KocEjcHFpMTC+6bfucJLzWcTEXFFFQm6YoMghYVb14s+SAg8JegX4fmZu6zQP5e6uTJm5WYngrAZGyfz9OMYs0ZtacjC1fRlSw490t84UA8PMyIteo2qulc7QqdN3U4M0xnoniRy6BtSlt5O/XsOp+V/bJbM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709717654; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JinEX41/j7Pb/bWxW54bGmffaAtTNcThK8gdOptLKmY=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From: References:In-Reply-To; b=eF882WGEhiB5jRMSmh9kej6ISIvjqXudnfN1oQJNI0OIQL6cUh27R0qkBfSrcKwhZdUHDMt95q4od46vpDjKr4mB24Jq1VQajIl9DBbRC0WZju9RSO7Ue1wJson3YScNT72vByHxbjGPN20ZGVT5vp67a6fB6oue6Kc1wz41R2c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=flWszAUC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.199 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="flWszAUC" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B95DFF80A; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 09:34:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1709717649; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=od4s/GMAsr52sikJcFgvSYexwtnWDcy7Z22NE3GsHO0=; b=flWszAUCdRYte0IftesUvM5oIovUSfZcoWTw88vViiC3zzugdD6VABdpg/qSMIoiriNvEa HwQ6CavPBKPEtMWhjiB1Jcx/h+8QmodvIi2fHXR+EHqw0knNc60bHgC9MB/4YwpsxQsc9L C3Ay7A2aKHeZTAduHirmc4l7SsHzn9CiWUQXkpVsM9JP3ePCdLebbkVivyjkYGv4zw1ke8 +hHh9DdtCmExe4sk3tryFL2xap6DbZSDNF4cuFMZclKyl9eZQ22Nqi0Oh6HZzGGIAZmlNG JH9RAXidbdI6QKlNno1AjYAmVwYjQr9rrE4mEiX+dQ682P+Hxli1IYdpqvIboA== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 10:34:08 +0100 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] Add Mobileye EyeQ5 support to the Nomadik I2C controller & use hrtimers for timeouts Cc: "Linus Walleij" , "Rob Herring" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Conor Dooley" , "Thomas Bogendoerfer" , , , , , , "Gregory Clement" , "Vladimir Kondratiev" , "Thomas Petazzoni" , "Tawfik Bayouk" , "Jean Delvare" , "Guenter Roeck" , To: "Andi Shyti" From: =?utf-8?q?Th=C3=A9o_Lebrun?= X-Mailer: aerc 0.15.2 References: <20240229-mbly-i2c-v2-0-b32ed18c098c@bootlin.com> In-Reply-To: X-GND-Sasl: theo.lebrun@bootlin.com Hello Andi, On Wed Mar 6, 2024 at 2:49 AM CET, Andi Shyti wrote: > > Th=C3=A9o Lebrun (11): > > dt-bindings: i2c: nomadik: add mobileye,eyeq5-i2c bindings and ex= ample > > dt-bindings: hwmon: lm75: use common hwmon schema > > i2c: nomadik: rename private struct pointers from dev to priv > > i2c: nomadik: simplify IRQ masking logic > > i2c: nomadik: use bitops helpers > > i2c: nomadik: support short xfer timeouts using waitqueue & hrtim= er > > i2c: nomadik: replace jiffies by ktime for FIFO flushing timeout > > i2c: nomadik: fetch i2c-transfer-timeout-us property from devicet= ree > > i2c: nomadik: support Mobileye EyeQ5 I2C controller > > MIPS: mobileye: eyeq5: add 5 I2C controller nodes > > MIPS: mobileye: eyeq5: add evaluation board I2C temp sensor > > what's your plan for this series? If you extract into a separate > series the refactoring patches that are not dependent on the > bindings I could queue them up for the merge window. V3 is ready and will be sent today. I think we can get trailers from dt-bindings maintainers as the discussion has been caried out on this revision. Am I being too optimistic of seeing this series queued before the merge window? Thanks Andi, -- Th=C3=A9o Lebrun, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com