From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (relay1-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5344716132A; Tue, 7 May 2024 15:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.193 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715094465; cv=none; b=S1BgAPq6jqVmeyWQvcLZ108eLAzTRv60W/syZNkAnprE5g4ZMZLHWENoSSoBDzJYtY9iV0suTHMr/XGYzHZKAHs/Cd17OPhFcEKJKJw3TbRiQkzVFzUNHJXu0DOFzHShpR+S5qZBwDtd7nW6zEVRR5EBm/RBaSZM2t0Prara3YE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715094465; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UaQVvlK7uFSTTAgQAcJhZCMHMi2rIAYqLbFWW1dKZpE=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:To:From:Subject:Cc: References:In-Reply-To; b=j3hTHx/htf9+hgSgsHQ+Hn1ZTULO4qwIic/tOLnbw8bMSeM/7zEduAs1QRHMJvWsu/iNccS4xKeu7gcGZljyliNK+OYMJdkT3J2SILIul8u5wy8E8MecGOoCF2xLq1GmUpP78j2JcgpOTTkLiWWzhypDxFKt+641t/8S4cJuYRs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=IgSXrtIE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.193 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="IgSXrtIE" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82A1C24000B; Tue, 7 May 2024 15:07:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1715094460; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UaQVvlK7uFSTTAgQAcJhZCMHMi2rIAYqLbFWW1dKZpE=; b=IgSXrtIEG4/C+lOXqlsXePSOdnwI1SABeDG763VaWxy+S+JXj4runTgPnKwdcHfuXTtzba yjZzI3rAwxFFAtc1tHjH3hSj8b0NJCCr8/fb5bQmLzH2do82wj6QKoj0IOc4+4AbdGMvBa DGyTqXuROwkGduBJU4SSUeh5irlEVVXmMXyWt+KzZ03vETHcTZdXx2tnyRFDWYA4QtAais n7y4ENDEWFfwGejQpba4RWN5ctoHl9jmDY6yPKNIIIxPNsNPbU4D26dINW+HsOKYznFdtU TGP30EEV0j/YPSTEHa9+kQnCO0pYGHWOG2XfLoTqwxYA4CfLoibIYZhqMMKi2A== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 17:07:39 +0200 Message-Id: To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Rob Herring" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Conor Dooley" , "Michael Turquette" , "Stephen Boyd" , "Philipp Zabel" , "Linus Walleij" , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Lee Jones" , "Thomas Bogendoerfer" From: =?utf-8?q?Th=C3=A9o_Lebrun?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] dt-bindings: clock: mobileye,eyeq5-clk: drop bindings Cc: , , , , , "Vladimir Kondratiev" , "Gregory CLEMENT" , "Thomas Petazzoni" , "Tawfik Bayouk" X-Mailer: aerc 0.17.0 References: <20240503-mbly-olb-v2-0-95ce5a1e18fe@bootlin.com> <20240503-mbly-olb-v2-1-95ce5a1e18fe@bootlin.com> <13ed1865-d702-47b6-b186-d5f060103280@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <13ed1865-d702-47b6-b186-d5f060103280@linaro.org> X-GND-Sasl: theo.lebrun@bootlin.com Hello, On Fri May 3, 2024 at 6:05 PM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 03/05/2024 17:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 03/05/2024 16:20, Th=C3=A9o Lebrun wrote: > >> Switch from sub-nodes in system-controller for each functionality to a > >> single node representing the entire OLB instance. dt-bindings is > >> unnecessary and soc/mobileye/mobileye,eyeq5-olb.yaml will inherit all > >> properties. > >=20 > > Why changing this? You just added these bindings not so long time ago..= . > > This is very confusing to push bindings and then immediately ask to > > remove them. See this revision as a proposal of something that has been asked multiple times in previous reviews. See message from Stephen Boyd on last revision [0], or discussion with Rob Herring on much earlier revision [1]. Proposal from Stephen Boyd of using auxiliary devices makes sense, that could be the future direction of this series. It won't change the dt-bindings aspect of it, only the driver implementations. [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/daa732cb31d947c308513b535930c729.sboyd@ke= rnel.org/ [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240124151405.GA930997-robh@kernel.org/ > One more point - anyway this should be revert with clear explanation WHY > you are reverting bindings. I'll make sure to use standard revert formatting and explain why it is being done. Thanks, -- Th=C3=A9o Lebrun, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com