From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-173.mta1.migadu.com (out-173.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A382238C19; Fri, 9 May 2025 16:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746809514; cv=none; b=IQOO3d7n881EXR1WlHoy9ALSpq8BoGJNoZLdhBfHWYVfSa7L5HT/0o7/rxSQUB/dvNd+FCZH5Sl9yKXKd+d0U6MYhJhgHOiyOfLILifomuLB0Dbl10u7166BIsnieNH0uDpg6IvmStYMnOrlA2Fffm7z4RplVPy1QSayVL5skZI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746809514; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9tmfUQl7n6sCe4B6VOxGhrGgZC2hfLqoLZRw4v0V5dg=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=joAaeE0UGAFZu2qvuXgh6cUIWW4n4A71OHEzfjfacLJ5AIs1U4J2gbtkY2C0nZsQr8nGZESuHuurmHAj2BBowQaCO7Z9Mm4GTg4EwN8i6FfVcfm6m6OwrGV1i9H4VqTxWE2U2+i2AOs57RyY54oY9xR7dMRwwyqcAOuiBNa72IE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=cknow.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cknow.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cknow.org header.i=@cknow.org header.b=P/NX0RgH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=cknow.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cknow.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cknow.org header.i=@cknow.org header.b="P/NX0RgH" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cknow.org; s=key1; t=1746809509; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Ckl3vux5StOjvP2+47jrXU3fLRpLeSvxiApo1TU/VDQ=; b=P/NX0RgHit5EEJXk2v6IpDcc0CmX9jjuKGJ8J8O5RFsGJ+rX/Zfmu63/p9HRzmJ0SEju20 pN/gP6SdukESlLnnl2aOcQMGBMKpLbRL94g/juVXzwRKDpD05cfRZQ8VUzJA29MnSUgMZo ZY4jHyKEEzcKFwwvHSoce0HjegXD/XQoC3oHYQxUqnMJtD5Job1emTRTCTV1VNsFpYqyB4 jx8bXA/Cqycgs8BL93wm4v4emqKSe08tJV905bRCSeEdKjQlyHIPr69944V7VG5RAvu1H0 GyRVpehpmWhks+9m0/OocqJs2C+FWFdssWbUkQJHyPXeEUX0eMh99gpsf78PVA== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=3e23f8a3f7dd23a047277bc59f050a2e77210dee6735ec02b945a8d601bd; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 18:51:21 +0200 Message-Id: Cc: "Conor Dooley" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Dragan Simic" , "Rob Herring" , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3568: Move PCIe3 MSI to use GIC ITS X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: "Diederik de Haas" To: "Diederik de Haas" , "Chukun Pan" , "Heiko Stuebner" References: <20250308093008.568437-1-amadeus@jmu.edu.cn> In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT --3e23f8a3f7dd23a047277bc59f050a2e77210dee6735ec02b945a8d601bd Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi again, On Fri May 9, 2025 at 5:34 PM CEST, Diederik de Haas wrote: > On Sat Mar 8, 2025 at 10:30 AM CET, Chukun Pan wrote: >> For a long time, rk3568's MSI-X had bugs and could only work on one node= . >> e.g. [ 7.250882] r8125 0002:01:00.0: no MSI/MSI-X. Back to INTx. >> >> Following commit b956c9de9175 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: rk356x: Move >> PCIe MSI to use GIC ITS instead of MBI"), change the PCIe3 controller's >> MSI on rk3568 to use ITS, so that all MSI-X can work properly. >> > I tested this patch on my NanoPi R5S with a 6.15-rc3 kernel + a number > of [vcc|phy]-supply patches that have been accepted for 6.16 (and a > small WIP LED patch). > > With this patch I get the following kernel warnings: > > pci 0001:10:00.0: Primary bus is hard wired to 0 > pci 0002:20:00.0: Primary bus is hard wired to 0 > > If I 'unapply' this patch, I don't see those warnings. I was pretty sure I had seen those messages before, but couldn't find them before. But now I have: on my rk3588-rock-5b. > It's possible that this patch only brought a(nother) problem to light, So it looks indeed to be this. Cheers, Diederik >> Chukun Pan (1): >> arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3568: Move PCIe3 MSI to use GIC ITS >> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568.dtsi | 8 ++++---- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --3e23f8a3f7dd23a047277bc59f050a2e77210dee6735ec02b945a8d601bd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQT1sUPBYsyGmi4usy/XblvOeH7bbgUCaB4yngAKCRDXblvOeH7b btTxAP9xcOOm/DKb1fMqBqNcR6qUMiNnWv1MKSyU06BFXAH6LQEAocEqmFyRa4iT xDj91oyTLTpAr8k0/xJZDB//WWhFPgs= =V4q7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3e23f8a3f7dd23a047277bc59f050a2e77210dee6735ec02b945a8d601bd--