From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-188.mta1.migadu.com (out-188.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.188]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6388428C2AF for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2025 15:15:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.188 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751296531; cv=none; b=ZT1u8G9jpsIcq9CFaOVx11l36yqzuIVHWvNLfxkA82saZnRsq+XkqIjYPRBtI8zQxBSDbJeWwGSl1NcpA+X/Zc8DIfmP2RBVkePmhBKGEeYV+xWWAkuF1Z5p58GIvx8C/nfmI0IEvalUiuYLvxlEc3f6i5bOL611Zh3XAffCta8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751296531; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3YRg2k4pE0gOn9+I/lnJDdKo+f7+9KmvohYEc+wGSI0=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Cc:Subject: References:In-Reply-To; b=FfhoSP+Phsknt05t9y1H5PqoiZQ6MOoGukzwy1ZWpLOY+gKMDLouHYtdR+rrRRbrqnSSx0qUFzHxUlDgCypRIB9UPUeXzn/+F56oekBSRJIBSgMU4eVfU6/bq6lD7vYf00wqG2uweuLs7sbYo5sNp85k+u6MQtdyge+zLxHXPLg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=cknow.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cknow.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cknow.org header.i=@cknow.org header.b=Ri0tU0wW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.188 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=cknow.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cknow.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cknow.org header.i=@cknow.org header.b="Ri0tU0wW" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cknow.org; s=key1; t=1751296524; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3YRg2k4pE0gOn9+I/lnJDdKo+f7+9KmvohYEc+wGSI0=; b=Ri0tU0wWigDP4ns/uMhq/DbtVnVrpFJULpOesADQNQN9Ttt6kCBagAkjDVGSK5VZC6AHOM ZWn79mbKvrEKuandb53v1+m+CqNi6PLgVySS5MdQjAhv4+/qUgV9wF25K7IsVDxSfRS0tz +XjPKyy798dJnbB2jfK5yw5XfQN73eHrk0t17S+dAUryNVgomhKBL21IHHqYAFwTK9HmBc 1whhZZh15zpymQw8SlW/Fuvba6GlHfvBYWNcjSiT40Z8MuWPEhi54VrZmOEg5YlnFy9i2z 0shugR0/yu/yovmPA5110JuR/CksANGaGSbA1RUTBBLMdJwasXbX34GBS4iROw== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=bd373288a0d8c3b229a1e6a0dff79d8e39c1f4f8b2c5ab7ef827047dc5fd; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 17:15:06 +0200 Message-Id: X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: "Diederik de Haas" To: "Christopher Morgan" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" Cc: "Chris Morgan" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "broonie@kernel.org" , "lgirdwood@gmail.com" , "sre@kernel.org" , "heiko@sntech.de" , "conor+dt@kernel.org" , "krzk+dt@kernel.org" , "robh@kernel.org" , "lee@kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/5] dt-bindings: mfd: ti,bq25703a: Add TI BQ25703A Charger References: <20250626195343.54653-1-macroalpha82@gmail.com> <20250626195343.54653-2-macroalpha82@gmail.com> <20250627-lurking-amorphous-elephant-e14c7f@krzk-bin> In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT --bd373288a0d8c3b229a1e6a0dff79d8e39c1f4f8b2c5ab7ef827047dc5fd Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon Jun 30, 2025 at 4:33 PM CEST, Christopher Morgan wrote: > On Jun 27, 2025, at 1:58=E2=80=AFAM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 02:53:39PM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote: >>> From: Chris Morgan >>>=20 >>> Document the Texas instruments BQ25703A series of charger managers/ >>> buck/boost regulators. >>>=20 >>> Signed-off-by: Chris Morgan >>=20 >> Didn't you receive tag? > > I did, I=E2=80=99m sorry but I thought the changes suggested were substan= tive > enough to warrant another review so I dropped it. I did leave it on > the other patches though. If I should have kept the tag I=E2=80=99ll try = to > remember next time. AFAIK that is a valid reason, but you should explicitly document that you did and why, so everyone knows it's not an 'oversight'. --bd373288a0d8c3b229a1e6a0dff79d8e39c1f4f8b2c5ab7ef827047dc5fd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQT1sUPBYsyGmi4usy/XblvOeH7bbgUCaGKqBQAKCRDXblvOeH7b bv/9AP9K8HfNsGjfd6lNsvgCpoQ4VKS4FOwXFjz2vljl9DJZEwD/fdDEa/yHtCyk 4/fNaRMhbrX7HECCNCCfkC3VxppukQM= =00g9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bd373288a0d8c3b229a1e6a0dff79d8e39c1f4f8b2c5ab7ef827047dc5fd--