From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f48.google.com (mail-ej1-f48.google.com [209.85.218.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 331151F0E24 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2025 07:43:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.48 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752219831; cv=none; b=N/HNVR6Qx+V3GoycJP50oxgT1GsqU+QJn2tA7kdNXEplaaawyOTHoB/SconntXetawHJs5k050ZHzQ+b28hKomKyypBEYZTBBv6JqUHa8NBKXIIpQ+UWBTNt0LW9XKLdXIhhaAXXBOyIeDgmCKiDFKtozgN2EGTyBSI7hIS34xo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752219831; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CeWd6R0BO1sCTLl4uPfwyEIiA1cWcbzfMdI5RwEd9jE=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=fJRjE/C3FfnuPj1UyL5ozE2wKWvvbDRInhiSJZUtYYbPRFYvAzNAzSDeNJ0+5PvG9DyeWHdO5WJLkQ1uiD2g8LvQkiCJI8gWFNqoGG6oyWVRtjfVK51x4tehJyibCkr+N438teP8nPGf5/1LrUI7RTe3+YlG3WbOKUan+cSO8JU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=fairphone.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fairphone.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fairphone.com header.i=@fairphone.com header.b=nYaYZVfm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.48 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=fairphone.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fairphone.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fairphone.com header.i=@fairphone.com header.b="nYaYZVfm" Received: by mail-ej1-f48.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-ae223591067so296752666b.3 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2025 00:43:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fairphone.com; s=fair; t=1752219827; x=1752824627; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:cc:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=3IIaUlC/iOoJ+QVPC0O3jLr9bGCpNKQPquWiGz3IsOM=; b=nYaYZVfmbWx9dQNXbLHrnfVH1lfkbxH2xTDw/rgUr9U9x5DmgidnNP1BuwkoCURpyP jcomr4Vt0lNWCC1i4lJvns4c2eES1+5CLloGzKYhzM+3Qm/no+NUqfRxV1jWDK8T3l5K mubRBba+O7sZ+3cErT5Z2iktaePg6wswX0OLyuD1OcIY5Gc8wnlbYdFAYt8TpbvsAZha d55IH+dS1BiaoZCw8W0OpIwRPg56I8i5vZ2v7Lo4MORSbQ7hCtkE1bIAsordtv8Kq3Kj Dfvc4RGAyGs2VWersRxTzcWIjXIn9JptF6DH0dzxQ/OvW3nl6y9rdteSNZWV1LlP5CY0 nrHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1752219827; x=1752824627; h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:cc:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3IIaUlC/iOoJ+QVPC0O3jLr9bGCpNKQPquWiGz3IsOM=; b=meyhbbJcYoITfdjs7Ndhh3VIhOSWQQo07ui/r9w8GAhhdgn9UfWuDWI8hDK5grbmEG XDXTldjz06pM/uGmKwkrRR6lBWiOUIRTDS3Q4QF2wQ4FmKj7lclCM+j2DsuH+DtujFdx ApWTRrUmroJcT2qNOhmEA//DFddDIN0AZTH4bwPk3rxYi0vYVCddnBkDGU2NIcFrVpRX NgC5k31N3tCVbWB/jNtL9g+S663WQEMiXBexKK6xsjyzf4kCk7H/e7W5HmHAH8VuShXV C7UiXGJFdVuJMcBtwZav+qA607XHSvqh/FgQgJLViLa7OvwdvLKmuRFU7wCRMxl/sxND jykQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWal1QOQo+jKclSzod321NJ6d9SOPq49f+P6DA1GoiY3dzIkhKpVvO4chzQVU50VjfBrejmJNM9e6Z5@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyMwe+vuZfg4Qo4n05I/143uYqTfVrQfNCTKhcFEBc9vBO7JZ6G mu6miOV3VZJrH46Xem48l07/P5EQ2NUhtZioQfJhszlTMBlVLa4/XwkWyWfPjURlM9s= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsa0zkvwo6xbdKO+uz4Nvyf4i3kADy+8hrC3tspX4utb2fjv+WAIxZVzeEw4OF zhzkdO4z1uvlDWcZLV9Kbl+6awM/DhbpLawtvJEeopLJzmPH5c8h26Q3iH6nrhyxUHhE9CSwnj0 R8v3A7Y+qzwAVCSVsPsvmNMoXzUs7RaL+/Kcr09Jy9yYBbRgKxCrvhB77AZZl7HiIl31lZ6jWMY +21AdvGTdCKBac1X1C0pPy5TPNz783o+y4K8/mfiveZiOCwoGxW66WQS/bHVPEXHqE9Sqhz821D VJFJNagyyz4E0XTc8rgWUtmCoJbpl8moyArBjAoql0HaPIQ6paCi+bxG1aeRArPIqg0KgaaOF0R zBvIaNr7diI1JtuzhTFnx8CvfzeVe+y1/HrwamL/OzFGjKF84F4n8cDeEghmSqJH5mPA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFTYupbQy72RBvYwBS8ueAvzrjXrAehsUXPExTpFAM8Ni+N0B33aqtgCjScHufwI8X0ZAMX1g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fe0c:b0:ae3:5212:c906 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-ae6fbe13960mr253963566b.10.1752219827399; Fri, 11 Jul 2025 00:43:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (144-178-202-139.static.ef-service.nl. [144.178.202.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-ae6e7e90c70sm259816466b.13.2025.07.11.00.43.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Jul 2025 00:43:46 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 09:43:46 +0200 Message-Id: Cc: , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/sysfb: simpledrm: Add support for interconnect paths From: "Luca Weiss" To: "Javier Martinez Canillas" , "Hans de Goede" , "Maarten Lankhorst" , "Maxime Ripard" , "Thomas Zimmermann" , "David Airlie" , "Simona Vetter" , "Rob Herring" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Conor Dooley" , "Helge Deller" X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.1-0-g2ecb8770224a-dirty References: <20250623-simple-drm-fb-icc-v2-0-f69b86cd3d7d@fairphone.com> <20250623-simple-drm-fb-icc-v2-3-f69b86cd3d7d@fairphone.com> <87qzz5d3le.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set> In-Reply-To: <87qzz5d3le.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set> Hi Javier, On Fri Jun 27, 2025 at 9:51 AM CEST, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Luca Weiss writes: > >> Some devices might require keeping an interconnect path alive so that >> the framebuffer continues working. Add support for that by setting the >> bandwidth requirements appropriately for all provided interconnect >> paths. >> >> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann >> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/sysfb/simpledrm.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= +++++++ >> 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sysfb/simpledrm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sysfb/s= impledrm.c >> index 349219330314e3421a6bb26ad5cf39a679a5cb7a..47d213e20cab1dd1e1952867= 4a95edea00f4bb30 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sysfb/simpledrm.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sysfb/simpledrm.c >> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ >> =20 >> #include >> #include >> +#include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> @@ -225,6 +226,10 @@ struct simpledrm_device { >> struct device **pwr_dom_devs; >> struct device_link **pwr_dom_links; >> #endif > > Can you add a /* interconnects */ comment here? Similarly how there is on= e > for clocks, regulators, power domains, etc. Sure! > >> +#if defined CONFIG_OF && defined CONFIG_INTERCONNECT >> + unsigned int icc_count; >> + struct icc_path **icc_paths; >> +#endif >> =20 > > ... > >> +static int simpledrm_device_attach_icc(struct simpledrm_device *sdev) >> +{ >> + struct device *dev =3D sdev->sysfb.dev.dev; >> + int ret, count, i; >> + >> + count =3D of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "interconnects", >> + "#interconnect-cells"); >> + if (count < 0) >> + return 0; >> + >> + /* An interconnect path consists of two elements */ >> + if (count % 2) { >> + drm_err(&sdev->sysfb.dev, >> + "invalid interconnects value\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + sdev->icc_count =3D count / 2; >> + >> + sdev->icc_paths =3D devm_kcalloc(dev, sdev->icc_count, >> + sizeof(*sdev->icc_paths), >> + GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!sdev->icc_paths) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + for (i =3D 0; i < sdev->icc_count; i++) { >> + sdev->icc_paths[i] =3D of_icc_get_by_index(dev, i); >> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sdev->icc_paths[i])) { >> + ret =3D PTR_ERR(sdev->icc_paths[i]); >> + if (ret =3D=3D -EPROBE_DEFER) >> + goto err; >> + drm_err(&sdev->sysfb.dev, "failed to get interconnect path %u: %d\n"= , >> + i, ret); > > You could use dev_err_probe() instead that already handles the -EPROBE_DE= FER > case and also will get this message in the /sys/kernel/debug/devices_defe= rred > debugfs entry, as the reason why the probe deferral happened. Not quite sure how to implement dev_err_probe, but I think this should be quite okay? if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sdev->icc_paths[i])) { ret =3D dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(sdev->icc_paths[i]), "failed to get interconnect path %u\n", i); if (ret =3D=3D -EPROBE_DEFER) goto err; continue; } That would still keep the current behavior for defer vs permanent error while printing when necessary and having it for devices_deferred for the defer case. Not sure what the difference between drm_err and dev_err are, but I trust you on that. Let me know. Regards Luca > > Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas