From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: dec behavior question Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:10:03 -0500 Message-ID: References: <9942C069-D8EC-4133-B436-1DC5F62C502E@kernel.crashing.org> <20111024231529.GE4191@truffala.fritz.box> <9F6FE96B71CF29479FF1CDC8046E1503253081@039-SN1MPN1-004.039d.mgd.msft.net> <0F565319-C054-4B46-8548-7BF4227BD237@kernel.crashing.org> <20111025233643.GA5760@truffala.fritz.box> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20111025233643.GA5760-MK4v0fQdeXQXU02nzanrWNbf9cGiqdzd@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: David Gibson Cc: Yoder Stuart-B08248 , devicetree-discuss List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Oct 25, 2011, at 6:36 PM, David Gibson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:41:55AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: >> >> On Oct 25, 2011, at 7:18 AM, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: devicetree-discuss-bounces+stuart.yoder=freescale.com-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org >>>> [mailto:devicetree-discuss-bounces+stuart.yoder=freescale.com-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of >>>> David Gibson >>>> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 6:15 PM >>>> To: Kumar Gala >>>> Cc: devicetree-discuss >>>> Subject: Re: dec behavior question >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 09:01:49AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: >>>>> If I have something like: >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------- >>>>> spi.dtsi: >>>>> >>>>> &spi0 { >>>>> #address-cells = <1>; >>>>> #size-cells = <0>; >>>>> compatible = "fsl,mpc8536-espi"; >>>>> reg = <0x7000 0x1000>; >>>>> interrupts = <59 0x2 0 0>; >>>>> }; >>>>> --------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> foo.dts: >>>>> >>>>> spi0: spi@f00bar { >>>>> compatible = "FOOBAR"; >>>>> }; >>>>> >>>>> /include/ "spi.dtsi" >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> What do you expect the resulting dtb to look like w/regards to the >>>>> compatible node? >>>> >>>> It's always last tree wins. So it will end up with compatible = "FOOBAR". >>> >>> If last wins, then it would be the included file >>> (compatible = "fsl,mpc8536-espi"), no? > > Uh, yes, sorry. I misread and assumed the /include/ came first. > >> I don't believe so because the include of spi.dtsi doesn't actually >> instantiate a node. This is a little different than use of >> 'include' for merging of nodes. > > No, it really isn't. /include/ is just a textual include. If a node > is defined multiple times, properties in the last definition always > win. So than is there a way to do this? It seems that node references have to come after their use. Not exactly sure why that would be the case. ---- the following is invalid ---- /dts-v1/; &spi0 { compatible = "fsl,mpc8536-espi"; }; /{ spi0: spi@0 { compatible = "kumar"; }; };