Hi, > > > @@ -129,6 +130,13 @@ static int gpio_regmap_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip, > > > unsigned int base, val, reg, mask; > > > int invert, ret; > > > > > > + if (gpio->fixed_direction_output) { > > > + if (test_bit(offset, gpio->fixed_direction_output)) > > > + return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_OUT; > > > + else > > > + return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_IN; > > > + } > > > + > > > if (gpio->reg_dat_base && !gpio->reg_set_base) > > > return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_IN; > > > if (gpio->reg_set_base && !gpio->reg_dat_base) > > > @@ -277,6 +285,17 @@ struct gpio_regmap *gpio_regmap_register(const struct gpio_regmap_config *config > > > return ERR_PTR(ret); > > > > Not related to your patch, but this line above is wrong. That should > > be "goto err_free_gpio". Would you mind adding a patch for it? I > > could do it myself, but it will probably conflict with this series. > > I'm fine either way (if you do it, don't forget the Fixes: tag). > > If this would be the only change, I would not do a v5. If there are more > things to change, of course. Fine by me. > > > } > > > > > > + if (config->fixed_direction_output) { > > > + gpio->fixed_direction_output = bitmap_alloc(chip->ngpio, > > > + GFP_KERNEL); > > > + if (!gpio->fixed_direction_output) { > > > + ret = -ENOMEM; > > > + goto err_free_gpio; > > > + } > > > + bitmap_copy(gpio->fixed_direction_output, > > > + config->fixed_direction_output, chip->ngpio); > > > + } > > > + > > > /* if not set, assume there is only one register */ > > > gpio->ngpio_per_reg = config->ngpio_per_reg; > > > if (!gpio->ngpio_per_reg) > > > @@ -293,7 +312,7 @@ struct gpio_regmap *gpio_regmap_register(const struct gpio_regmap_config *config > > > > > > ret = gpiochip_add_data(chip, gpio); > > > if (ret < 0) > > > - goto err_free_gpio; > > > + goto err_free_bitmap; > > > > There's also an err_free_gpio jump below, that should also be > > replaced with err_free_bitmap. > > I am a bit confused. With this patch applied there is only one 'goto > err_free_gpio' in gpio-regmap.c and that's the one added by me above. > > What am I missing? Probably commit 553b75d4bfe9 ("gpio: regmap: Allow to allocate regmap-irq device") which was added to the mfd/gpio/next tree a couple of days ago. -michael