From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "Markus Probst" <markus.probst@posteo.de>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Saravana Kannan" <saravanak@google.com>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rust: of: Add basic DeviceNode abstractions,
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 16:31:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DD5CV7ZXZDTA.26QKFT8OJO6SN@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09c855b24873ba71b1c1e968d0b6d0c010843699.camel@posteo.de>
On Mon Sep 29, 2025 at 4:00 PM CEST, Markus Probst wrote:
> Add a safe wrapper arround `struct device_node`, which is capable of:
>
> * reading string, u32 and bool properties
>
> * iterating over children
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Probst <markus.probst@posteo.de>
Can you please expand on the commit message a bit? What's the motivation? Why
can't you use device/fwnode properties instead?
Also, the patch seems mangled by your mail client, the corresponding MTA, etc.
Please have a look into fixing this up. You can also try to send a patch to
yourself first and see if it still applies for this purpose.
Thanks,
Danilo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-29 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-29 14:00 [PATCH v2] rust: of: Add basic DeviceNode abstractions, Markus Probst
2025-09-29 14:31 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2025-09-29 14:57 ` Markus Probst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DD5CV7ZXZDTA.26QKFT8OJO6SN@kernel.org \
--to=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=markus.probst@posteo.de \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox