From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com (mail-wr1-f45.google.com [209.85.221.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82EB13570DA for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2026 10:14:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.45 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770027284; cv=none; b=mcckMSlC/i6w/5njSTV/JMPwRw9onaGm5yq/Bgj+V1O1ZRtKwTS8ahFWTOSJI7SdIJc+cAJM2yC1OFM243fSLDhr3KZqZHqDZs/iJpNGMLMTN8RkUAzy4dv9UBaYeqeSLiDpXJ8ysgXpYuOexvzAn6ai49VdMgImnIb8OjcL9uQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770027284; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2auIHPqsiVDrUHz2mfGeHvAJ5QYC0LUiVSGItMyWde8=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=ICSfUU34QUZcR7A5/c83xR/zZ3Bvk8lkpJlNf4t0n+SsK1HbTg9q8aEokv5CuewprE3hriLE+tzUYgbc2S9SsFApSwiBvd7f+0epNez81xMLseJQ02U9lDvfme0wFRqoOq3/+PoJH/swt80Ox0TGBBYutld+PlE4Kyjse2etI6s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=fairphone.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fairphone.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fairphone.com header.i=@fairphone.com header.b=V+K9Fu5D; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.45 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=fairphone.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fairphone.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fairphone.com header.i=@fairphone.com header.b="V+K9Fu5D" Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-432d28870ddso2573254f8f.3 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2026 02:14:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fairphone.com; s=fair; t=1770027280; x=1770632080; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:cc:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Jr6CwQYi+BmExRh3DhyFfDwqTiLalKND+P2i3zpKjwg=; b=V+K9Fu5DtNA+L2iWRTqq32SGjUjrf2gUTe7dEszqRc5zMLtA/ZUbesQXh/pUxwDXT0 etprW+C+0LPRXiXyzEwFoDNGSHELadGytBozL9+GHtBz9rgZCLBE3YCN/bLCB2N6vsKb 1QXiVuO9nny1QVLyh9KUTY2LqWvNG43gYaPFHNjwDGN9+Hjq3AypqpEh+Q1+Pg97MfG9 fy7TYkhODBsAyJvgS8sBXo/2neLXKbVQDgvuclKIm77kErntEfpAO6rPt6lFjHFI8LhU ebrCpC58yN2ilv5mqIvgGokIu0IVL0IkV7aBEmcLc77VPv7ba1/K+EMskBxIbDxOnl9m rCcg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1770027280; x=1770632080; h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:cc:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Jr6CwQYi+BmExRh3DhyFfDwqTiLalKND+P2i3zpKjwg=; b=b2mmsZnhh12/OU4SKnkKtEBerG3H3PQddI+OrUuUm19zeIQt99XQtXvsQ5aBWlY9nH W3WJXsm1hDpRlBYRkWIEBs56Q7CcCGi/R+TFKZ1vxA2jNW6xirgMwlu5Xv05q1gCMRtY 2MvLloxibbG6GUGDOuWfoYQn4HjBJ3pg6Kcqw9hV9244b8EPLWxuiskEH94xNvIBEC46 hSREEE0raMPG8mKF7ia24trC9+NEC0KSvhRghR7ViVhGyAHcgy7Mu0V3g2hx87TVkqJm EjELCtqPUlF6jL8Yz2dVPvB10IHvaU/9sBlD3IaAxH8OqQlgRCWmTXoIAmM/gEbCwvxk yhjA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUqq0qe+qMKI08zomxLdYyykKxhqCKRZJMGxawxLTSHJG29ypLAj78TKgGuFQ/vD0OC4fbGO9WzfEGV@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy4xOjvBa4hi9JBzBhS4w3NOZVshLiJUFwDcYHpnqt2kj79E5jh wvuV887IMwRr9nWIsA2CPTYIvP1aOUx0JIaRL28XNvvR3XPAgvY4cJKY+XgUiHpZ9mo= X-Gm-Gg: AZuq6aLhxforqYmz7wOWGpmGPhzp6+6THooIWhpGmzaaaf64J8pTql1ppqK9bhXl6/j rPvk2zZPoVydRTJBxsc5oab45xpItOXyPF82l1Cp2H+1HiLwFIrZ8gm4FOLTF4KF38Vv22izk5C BjCPtyxMhOm/BRuS4I8SBYVSJVC+GOOvJlmRHZTlmeyHqmt5keI1X7gxdK9Fbkx2fsaHS9Xg75G U8cBYowaF0JxVHhK624IVx7Lxe6DJHZJrmdmRih2i46pqIS0em35GJ3ROf7beTLzaPtTHDhDlB8 Gr1iv3NzhOTR8PJcVruwAgKNXFzQZ8dpxbI5IeifHZIo55wkilEuziEtZy2ipaxkinO8cAPyzjc yyRNZEflS6kCV2Ir8X/LvYbDQIHGYNHKaa+k5IleSsmhPF/BtUSr93wxPT/AaoUPI+rIu8DR8xc aQhbr74NQKfa1CDjGa4sCgiVPZi8VA8tU6HmKoDNUahd1ssBGPl+26Tt3y X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5f51:0:b0:432:5c43:76 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-435f3aafca9mr15610107f8f.39.1770027279835; Mon, 02 Feb 2026 02:14:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (244.60-200-80.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be. [80.200.60.244]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-435e10edf62sm46960096f8f.13.2026.02.02.02.14.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Feb 2026 02:14:39 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2026 11:14:38 +0100 Message-Id: Cc: "Rob Herring" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Conor Dooley" , "Bjorn Andersson" , "Konrad Dybcio" , "Luca Weiss" , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Input: aw86938 - add driver for Awinic AW86938 From: "Luca Weiss" To: "Konrad Dybcio" , "Dmitry Torokhov" , "Griffin Kroah-Hartman" X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-0-g5549850facc2 References: <20260128-aw86938-driver-v2-0-b51ee086aaf5@fairphone.com> <20260128-aw86938-driver-v2-2-b51ee086aaf5@fairphone.com> <472d7db3-db34-4966-aa17-588e1153ba12@oss.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: <472d7db3-db34-4966-aa17-588e1153ba12@oss.qualcomm.com> Hi Konrad, On Mon Feb 2, 2026 at 11:12 AM CET, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 2/1/26 2:49 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >> Hi Griffin, >>=20 >> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 04:51:14PM +0100, Griffin Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> @@ -717,9 +746,19 @@ static int aw86927_detect(struct aw86927_data *hap= tics) >>> =20 >>> chip_id =3D be16_to_cpu(read_buf); >>> =20 >>> - if (chip_id !=3D AW86927_CHIPID) { >>> - dev_err(haptics->dev, "Unexpected CHIPID value 0x%x\n", chip_id); >>> - return -ENODEV; >>> + switch (haptics->model) { >>> + case AW86927: >>> + if (chip_id !=3D AW86927_CHIPID) { >>> + dev_err(haptics->dev, "Unexpected CHIPID value 0x%x\n", chip_id); >>> + return -ENODEV; >>> + } >>=20 >> If we are able to query chip ID why do we need to have separate >> compatibles? I would define chip data structure with differences between >> variants and assign and use it instead of having separate compatible. > > dt-bindings guidelines explicitly call for this, a chipid comparison > then works as a safety net Are you saying, that 1. we should enforce dt-bindings =3D=3D CHIP_ID (what's currently done) or 2. we should have both compatibles with no handling based on compatible, but only use CHIP_ID at runtime to change behavior Regards Luca