From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com (mail-wr1-f42.google.com [209.85.221.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FED82367DF for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2026 02:19:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.42 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775096383; cv=none; b=f9rx0Hh44Vjf4zDyQoXD2Hi5gKQhebIklX+KeJ5PMXJb+piQ02gEJsmJ5GxDNPjkctXS42sFUokAsDzK/NX6fYeobf0Tt/iZqtD66ksbOlUYg+Ob7BAhh9XgtcClGx6H5oe7A2aYlAaZukvSP+COawMPtvhXEwbvo/eumQeCK58= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775096383; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HYGP2hISTZIOwm7KcS+DDptEEs44HrRNLaMy7aCvf7A=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=VQSafLLBiskhSgy6tUhpRM6v+lZ/Eo/x61CN0gkGYM4bzmSan/hyBvuHuulSzd0FCFbMbamqTfkZ3G5hvL47HohLY6KAzHKy745riRdtxf5b/kapna8yM4KB4aRJdpUkUmaUfjRudf+Iv82YpOSKi1ryisafxILUeIlZaG3wJvU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b=GAPMwA4f; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.42 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="GAPMwA4f" Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-43b87970468so305292f8f.3 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2026 19:19:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1775096380; x=1775701180; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:cc:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=HYGP2hISTZIOwm7KcS+DDptEEs44HrRNLaMy7aCvf7A=; b=GAPMwA4fGw5vhwXgL138EKOPqA9xLfPo3PLJuDSG1bMAgMWCsVP31Ky3rH6wM1UbaB bSlcPv3PQYr5bVLaeeA1vjLH1R7oIjnzIkBaXmzwnmSj1uXSpj3jcd7J2jdpKgpbnVmW TPi+6nF3Azh1UhCIBx2oOCLHZQke83U1+kNRa4pDgvPKHZlaMyTScpq9N0sLtpZ1NwW8 3LpM8cGzxH0sK7dcfdbv/N1s1usnkPnAJR4fCppGYQJC8kz7SFUH+Nkkme5ciWpT7ICZ 2T944cIwhqVlkmOAbBFEhlNgu1X9X6NdZ+ywfPNOcj1LAJ5OuwrwW7VSxeY9PnspOj/x luYg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1775096380; x=1775701180; h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:cc:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HYGP2hISTZIOwm7KcS+DDptEEs44HrRNLaMy7aCvf7A=; b=qnAykdhOQnCjnokKaaHyuGQCC5JPCkx6crqD4SrebFmGGfddq9zMKMIm0sMb+8BmIe FjUsum+mKTkkVUvHZeeElgMfr4jRofVDA9GgX59uxwccTfXhaK8pNGk8BdQzrb1Uy9l2 NhQMM0PQSA57+t70cCHpFH0/z3ceC15DIfTYBVYJpv9iDVAaF3H9IQOdGz/Fe3EEn0B0 4p6T1Ks0wig+NTe/erpa70b77XqIkYsp9+0t50UXg1v0iocOMohTK9+HLE4pQ5Ksp9gA 8yway+6tHeux3HqNEoki4Z4MwWUrXYx7EwT4GPzehzWv97FT4Po7R8gMeLnc1p94WKro Pd2g== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXseMRATqMvwUc8yad/MkMjGJ2tIL6wAlRV/yJqWwdXDmNak8C7ZkSVLF2rbkfSh42LxoiwbEeL0L27@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyejc5cXKYDH8QmhrE509Hv2b7/R11lN6PGxrK4yxag0TfVKP2N fh9UL9f2fT+MOS3oNPXnrDCMAKE+8kGEt1I0wReRri+SUgTLs3s/eJY/BX6ZRNWJv7E= X-Gm-Gg: ATEYQzx1r7CH6rVaFHVlMcZ64SnpQ/jod4d5yr/7XO8I1X5yBi2RluhvbWaW7b+U5NR 4Zfag0K1NgeUUi6iQ7QqpThGgqr+uHP9ErQaoCXP7YAVpKJWHh5zmqLyuivNHHFEHvgnTpjgCVM t80X9/bIWYFo4MVm4BunmtRu309pBIuVc5YsW0Z45K1BAR7/qZOmePb+x92ay9psBQmKl6az7ea AMl03jJWHdzvMy35aQgbaCerPaV7GQlind1YIZN5K85ihC4q0F+iloWgDUqgCmbVfK70BOn4FlA d94HwghjkFQz+Zhfyg2nDG9tWiJvPclPpnoESJfOxjWtxP0kj+mxHUa2lZ+7+5yiGjaNTD8sI9R OV1FWsNoiF6QWiD9SPXKXVtDpzP5zBHQaksyl2dvTG17KZnqTVO+ZFF1vp3L0Ob1694b+OfAMBT znUduNTvf9YQ4PKH0sqO5qoz/yL9U2iT+cntBInthF7uUsp55Eob012/TigE4XC9wH9VAqW79ML 3OX/ziI7P0JNw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2303:b0:439:beb9:5a96 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-43d150e8ba7mr11084985f8f.31.1775096380493; Wed, 01 Apr 2026 19:19:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([94.4.195.193]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-43d1e2c3a01sm3815604f8f.12.2026.04.01.19.19.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Apr 2026 19:19:39 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 03:19:37 +0100 Message-Id: Cc: "Sylwester Nawrocki" , "Chanwoo Choi" , "Alim Akhtar" , "Sam Protsenko" , "Michael Turquette" , "Stephen Boyd" , "Rob Herring" , "Conor Dooley" , "Tudor Ambarus" , "Jassi Brar" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Peter Griffin" , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Exynos850 APM-to-AP mailbox support From: "Alexey Klimov" To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Alexey Klimov" X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0 References: <20260320-exynos850-ap2apm-mailbox-v1-0-983eb3f296fc@linaro.org> <20260321-beautiful-garnet-magpie-de4fbd@quoll> In-Reply-To: <20260321-beautiful-garnet-magpie-de4fbd@quoll> On Sat Mar 21, 2026 at 10:44 AM GMT, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 09:15:12PM +0000, Alexey Klimov wrote: >> Hi all, >>=20 >> This patch series introduces support for the APM-to-AP mailbox on the=20 >> Exynos850 SoC. This mailbox is required for communicating with the APM= =20 >> co-processor using ACPM. >>=20 >> The Exynos850 mailbox operates similarly to the existing gs101=20 >> implementation, but the register offsets and IRQ mask bits differ.=20 >> This series abstracts these differences into platform-specific data=20 >> structures matched via the device tree. >>=20 >> Also, it requires APM-to-AP mailbox clock in CMU_APM block. >>=20 >> In theory this can be split into two series with correct dependecies: >> device tree node requires clock changes to be merged. The suggestion >> is to let this go through Samsung SoC tree with corresponding acks >> if it is okay. > > I don't understand why this cannot be split into two seris > *practically*. What is exactly the dependency between mailbox and DTS, > that it had to be combined here? Do you suggest to send 3 single patches with proper dependencies description? DT bindings change first, then mailbox change that specificall= y depends on dt-bindings change and then dts update (which will depend on bot= h)? I thought that mbox driver change depends implicitly on bindings update? Best regards, Alexey