From: "Markus Schneider-Pargmann" <msp@baylibre.com>
To: "Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
"Markus Schneider-Pargmann" <msp@baylibre.com>,
"Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@kernel.org>,
"Mathieu Poirier" <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Suman Anna" <s-anna@ti.com>, "Nishanth Menon" <nm@ti.com>,
"Tero Kristo" <kristo@kernel.org>
Cc: "Vishal Mahaveer" <vishalm@ti.com>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@baylibre.com>,
"Dhruva Gole" <d-gole@ti.com>,
"Sebin Francis" <sebin.francis@ti.com>,
"Kendall Willis" <k-willis@ti.com>,
"Akashdeep Kaur" <a-kaur@ti.com>,
<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a7-sk: Split r5f memory region
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 16:58:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DHS46FH9ZYZB.3BG6HVH832NAE@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c35fea4e-dc22-4314-9c5c-bfa5b880864d@ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3256 bytes --]
Hi Vignesh,
On Sat Apr 11, 2026 at 4:47 PM CEST, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
>
>
> On 10/04/26 19:12, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
>> Hi Vignesh,
>>
>> On Fri Apr 10, 2026 at 6:30 AM CEST, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
>>> Hi Markus
>>>
>>> On 18/03/26 20:43, Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI) wrote:
>>>> Split the firmware memory region in more specific parts so it is better
>>>> described where to find which information. Specifically the LPM metadata
>>>> region is important as bootloader software like U-Boot has to know where
>>>> that data is to be able to read that data.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI) <msp@baylibre.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts
>>>> index e99bdbc2e0cbdf858f1631096f9c2a086191bab3..c381cc33064ec427751a9ac5bcdff745a9559a89 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts
>>>> @@ -59,9 +59,33 @@ wkup_r5fss0_core0_dma_memory_region: memory@9c800000 {
>>>> no-map;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> - wkup_r5fss0_core0_memory_region: memory@9c900000 {
>>>> + wkup_r5fss0_core0_ipc_region: memory@9c900000 {
>>>
>>> There are still references to wkup_r5fss0_core0_memory_region in
>>> k3-am62a-ti-ipc-firmware.dtsi (same comment applies to next 2 patches as
>>> well)
>>>
>>> Dont those need to be updated too?
>>
>> I only updated the sk boards as these are the only ones that have IO+DDR
>> support that I know works and need the new memory region layout. But
>> thinking about this, updating the memory region structure shouldn't be a
>> problem for the other boards either, of course I can't tell if IO+DDR
>> would work on them, but the new memory region layout shouldn't break
>> anything.
>
> I am not talking about updating other boards, but specifically about
> k3-am62*-ti-ipc-firmware.dtsi which have a phandle reference to
> wkup_r5fss0_core0_memory_region. Therefore any dts trying to include
> this dtsi would fail to compile post this series.
I am not sure I understand why they would fail?
The current design is to have the k3-am62*-ti-ipc-firmware.dtsi files
reference the memory regions in the r5fss node, for example:
&wkup_r5fss0_core0 {
mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster0>, <&mbox_r5_0>;
memory-region = <&wkup_r5fss0_core0_dma_memory_region>,
<&wkup_r5fss0_core0_memory_region>;
memory-region-names = "dma", "firmware";
status = "okay";
};
But k3-am62*-ti-ipc-firmware.dtsi do not define these memory regions.
Instead it relies on the dts files to define them. That is done for
example in k3-am62a7-sk.dts and others.
This patch now changes the memory regions being used by r5fss0 as well
as the memory regions being defined but only in k3-am62a7-sk.dts. It
does not change the references or definitions in
k3-am62*-ti-ipc-firmware.dtsi.
So I think including the k3-am62*-ti-ipc-firmware.dtsi file should still
work as long as you have the memory regions defined in the dts file.
Best
Markus
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 289 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-13 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-18 15:13 [PATCH v3 0/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a7-sk: Split r5f memory region Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI)
2026-03-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-r5f: Split up memory regions Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI)
2026-03-26 14:53 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-03-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-r5f: Add memory-region-names Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI)
2026-03-26 14:53 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-03-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3: Use memory-region-names for r5f Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI)
2026-03-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a7-sk: Split r5f memory region Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI)
2026-04-10 4:30 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2026-04-10 13:42 ` Markus Schneider-Pargmann
2026-04-11 14:47 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2026-04-13 14:58 ` Markus Schneider-Pargmann [this message]
2026-03-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p5-sk: " Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI)
2026-03-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a7-sk: Add r5f nodes to pre-ram bootphase Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI)
2026-03-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p5-sk: " Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI)
2026-03-30 14:56 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a7-sk: Split r5f memory region Mathieu Poirier
2026-04-08 15:03 ` Rob Herring
2026-04-09 9:46 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2026-04-10 13:54 ` Markus Schneider-Pargmann
2026-04-11 14:47 ` (subset) " Vignesh Raghavendra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DHS46FH9ZYZB.3BG6HVH832NAE@baylibre.com \
--to=msp@baylibre.com \
--cc=a-kaur@ti.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=d-gole@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=k-willis@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=kristo@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=sebin.francis@ti.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=vishalm@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox