From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from layka.disroot.org (layka.disroot.org [178.21.23.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43CE63D75DE; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 06:13:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.21.23.139 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781590420; cv=none; b=C4CE6jZhInWDblqb/atfi0IS1qZJJdE3v6t7wCDpiGSlYvkNA/5u7FPhiK5OV2QBXZZ7us/EQS5zmPPOnfRAJXfwQSCwdsSaCs1XHz9YYL1z2YitaK6IaAkPtiP8q5A0rRITYR+TO7Yjo9Qq32h3h+cSUK74gQThh5iflbJtojM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781590420; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Joo+TGlqM14IUudZi1Fr7UJlpV/SNGBjCv+OYlhkoug=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=UFMtiU1fttOGkd5j5dfLC2KG77mt4shvSc9aG3oB7XbSqyy7yAumr0a7tlpR+oP6vgs9lHXUjuaGfoew1X436jkeHnzYCeQINWez8kkQT07Ro4wB3/av7IwJN8EVD5f/sHDm4Aba/9ieRlQD25yyEZ518CAlouQPSFkqBW81/yg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=disroot.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=disroot.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=disroot.org header.i=@disroot.org header.b=RZkZ3sHt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.21.23.139 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=disroot.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=disroot.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=disroot.org header.i=@disroot.org header.b="RZkZ3sHt" Received: from mail01.disroot.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C8E26EB4; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 08:13:36 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from layka.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id aDViMMbCDhrk; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 08:13:35 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1781590415; bh=Joo+TGlqM14IUudZi1Fr7UJlpV/SNGBjCv+OYlhkoug=; h=Date:Cc:Subject:From:To:References:In-Reply-To; b=RZkZ3sHtpGb1mRej1EIoaIM7RpzUJWs81+a+W+9EueXVg/233tH+OKjyv7gYiW6Qx xaRp12CTd2vcgpBCUeP8gExtRwU899WXTDh7YQFzc3efWXBJRBoyYhI19EBc0tQAHl jFZSh3Au7dKp6kurXKad9Bn+aqfA4TterIYRuiZ5GqSNFAiz5JRMuLKxFj1yKw+3ZW Rug+kBXkbCxCnb0Aog+7PINSvwj7/SZYfezn0GEPtUVf8SsV3jREgr/CmYogd6FFuw Hj0JhTO5WjaOqbShfv1DuXxUTceENTyORNVcbN0ElFwRZwMeJTvuddkc6efpXwEsIc Kg85JHMC+9WyQ== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 11:43:24 +0530 Message-Id: Cc: , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: s2mu005-pmic: reorder reg and interrupts properties From: "Kaustabh Chakraborty" To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Kaustabh Chakraborty" , =?utf-8?q?Andr=C3=A9_Draszik?= , "Lee Jones" , "Rob Herring" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Conor Dooley" , "Pavel Machek" References: <20260616-s2mu005-pmic-supplement-v1-0-41e84518b711@disroot.org> <20260616-s2mu005-pmic-supplement-v1-1-41e84518b711@disroot.org> <7dd8dcf3-5aec-442a-941e-7564936befa9@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <7dd8dcf3-5aec-442a-941e-7564936befa9@kernel.org> On 2026-06-16 06:14 +02:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 15/06/2026 22:26, Kaustabh Chakraborty wrote: >> As per convention, and as also reiterated by maintainers [1], the >> properties in schema is to be ordered similar to how its done in >> devicetree sources; starting from compatible and reg. Re-order the >> properties in this schema accordingly. >>=20 >> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0240eb13-6c56-4879-8db7-b990a220a78f@k= ernel.org [1] >> Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >> Signed-off-by: Kaustabh Chakraborty > > Honestly, nah... I commented on v6 so you change the patch. But you were > posting this huge patchset faster than we can review (v6 and v7 posted > on the same day!), so v7 got applied where you did not implement the > comments. One small posting per 24h. One big posting per 2-3 days, not > more often. Fair, there were a lot of sashiko reviews, so I quickly addressed most of them and send a v7. It is indeed a failure on my part. :( > There is little benefit in fixing this single file. Fine, I drop the series. I'd assumed it'd be at least fine to have it before a stable release. > Best regards, > Krzysztof