Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luca Ceresoli" <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
To: "Damon Ding" <damon.ding@rock-chips.com>,
	<sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: <conor+dt@kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Luca Ceresoli" <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Restore mandatory samsung DP DT properties
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 09:32:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DKSQUNWA86GP.9NHE4ADGYLQH@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00d3f58e-73bb-41da-a2df-dfeeca644b6f@rock-chips.com>

Hello Damon,

On Wed Jul 15, 2026 at 10:32 AM CEST, Damon Ding wrote:
> On 7/7/2026 12:17 PM, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
>> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
>> - [Critical] Failing probe when deprecated DT properties are missing breaks DT ABI and prevents their deprecation.
>> --
>>
>> --- Patch [3]: [PATCH v6 3/5] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Restore mandatory samsung DP DT properties ---
>> commit b573dba50acc6087122ffa4a65680322f4d004f8
>> Author: Damon Ding <damon.ding@rock-chips.com>
>>
>> drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Restore mandatory samsung DP DT properties
>>
>> This commit reverts a change that made the samsung,link-rate and
>> samsung,lane-count properties optional for Exynos DP. It adds error checking
>> to fail the probe early if these properties are missing, aiming to prevent
>> link training failures caused by zero values.
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
>>> index 8cf6b73bceac0..293d8adfe9856 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
>> [ ... ]
>>> @@ -1258,10 +1259,14 @@ static int analogix_dp_dt_parse_pdata(struct analogix_dp_device *dp)
>>>   		 * NOTE: those property parseing code is used for
>>>   		 * providing backward compatibility for samsung platform.
>>>   		 */
>>> -		of_property_read_u32(dp_node, "samsung,link-rate",
>>> -				     &video_info->max_link_rate);
>>> -		of_property_read_u32(dp_node, "samsung,lane-count",
>>> -				     &video_info->max_lane_count);
>>> +		if (of_property_read_u32(dp_node, "samsung,link-rate", &val))
>>> +			return dev_err_probe(dp->dev, -EINVAL,
>>> +					     "Failed to get samsung,link-rate\n");
>>
>> [Severity: Critical]
>> Does failing the probe when this property is missing break the DT ABI?
>>
>> Since samsung,link-rate is a deprecated property, a modern schema-compliant
>> Device Tree might intentionally omit it. If a system boots with such a DT,
>> this check will fail the probe with -EINVAL and disable the display.
>>
>> Could the driver instead fall back to hardware maximums or sensible defaults
>> when the deprecated property is absent, rather than returning an error?
>>
>
> I'm afraid it's difficult to provide a universal sensible default value
> here.
>
> The samsung,lane-count and samsung,link-rate values vary significantly
> across Exynos DP device trees, so a generic fallback to hardware
> maximums cannot guarantee stable link training.
>
> Even though these two properties are marked deprecated, all existing DTS
> files in our projects have already populated them completely. Moreover,
> the current link training logic relies on these two parameters; omitting
> either will directly cause link training failures at runtime.
>
> Therefore, retaining the mandatory property check in probe is a
> reasonable approach for now.

I'm still not convinced we should turn an optional property into mandatory,
after having been optional since 2016 (based on the commit in the Fixes:
tag).

The sure thing is we cannot break existing devices which upgrade to a new
kernel.

Se the question is: if a device is missing one of these properties, or
both, what happens? The video_info->max_link_rate and/or
video_info->max_lane_count will be zero, correct? And if they are zero, is
there even a remote possibility that the device will work somehow, maybe
only with some rare low resolution or whatever?

If the answer is "yes, there is a remote possibility that one sich device,
with some maybe rare configuration, will work", then no, we cannot make
this property mandatory now. There can be devices out there working without
these proberties, and they would be broken.

If the answer is "there is no way at all a device can work without one or
both properties", with a good explanation based on the code flow and
hardware docs, then we can consider this change.

Luca

--
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-19  7:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-07  4:06 [PATCH v6 0/5] Add eDP lane mapping support Damon Ding
2026-07-07  4:06 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] dt-bindings: display: bridge: analogix-dp: Add data-lanes support for endpoint Damon Ding
2026-07-07  4:06 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] drm/dp: Add helper to validate DP lane counts Damon Ding
2026-07-07  4:06 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Restore mandatory samsung DP DT properties Damon Ding
2026-07-07  4:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15  8:32     ` Damon Ding
2026-08-19  7:32       ` Luca Ceresoli [this message]
2026-08-19  8:19         ` Damon Ding
2026-08-19 12:37           ` Luca Ceresoli
2026-07-07  4:06 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Add validation for samsung,lane-count property Damon Ding
2026-08-10 15:20   ` Luca Ceresoli
2026-07-07  4:06 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Add support for optional data-lanes mapping Damon Ding
2026-07-07  4:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23  6:37 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] Add eDP lane mapping support Damon Ding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DKSQUNWA86GP.9NHE4ADGYLQH@bootlin.com \
    --to=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=damon.ding@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox