From: "Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
To: "Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>,
"Konrad Dybcio" <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@kernel.org>,
"Konrad Dybcio" <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
<cros-qcom-dts-watchers@chromium.org>
Cc: <~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht>,
<phone-devel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: kodiak: Elite-ify LPASS macros
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 16:43:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DLIISWYS60TX.BBXK30H05VRL@fairphone.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DJFFMB9BO7GF.3CIRW26SHUSD@fairphone.com>
Hi Konrad,
On Mon Jun 22, 2026 at 10:23 AM CEST, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On Wed Jun 17, 2026 at 12:05 PM CEST, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 5/22/26 4:46 PM, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>> Due to initial kodiak/sc7280 bringup being done for Chrome platforms,
>>> some Chrome-specific bits still remain in kodiak.dtsi, like the clocks
>>> and power-domains for the LPASS RX/TX/WSA/VA macros.
>>>
>>> Move them to sc7280-chrome-common.dtsi and put Elite (q6afecc)
>>> equivalents in its place. The qcs6490-audioreach.dtsi file can also drop
>>> deletion of power-domains properties then.
>>>
>>> This follows previous commits moving Chrome-specific configuration to
>>> the correct file, leaving kodiak.dtsi for Elite and
>>> qcs6490-audioreach.dtsi for AudioReach.
>>>
>>> No functional change intended. The clock-output-names property will now
>>> exist for both Chrome and AudioReach devices but this shouldn't have any
>>> relevant effect. And WSA macro clocks weren't added to Chrome because I
>>> don't believe this would've ever worked given it already referenced
>>> q6afecc and the nodes were originally added during AudioReach bringup.
>>
>> I think it's better to keep them, if only to make sure that the result
>> of dtx_diff isn't outside the expectation of a commit that claims to
>> only reshuffle data for these platforms
>
> I documented this in the commit message for this purpose.
>
> But I'd argue not putting (likely incorrect) wsa_macro overrides there
> is the better thing to do. Probably somebody should've taken care of the
> Chrome platforms when adding the wsa nodes in the first place.
Is that okay, or do you want me to change this? I'm still of the opinion
that adding a very-likely-broken WSA macro to chrome is not great.
Anything else to note? R-b would be nice :)
Regards
Luca
>
>>
>> It looks OK as-is for Elite and Audioreach platforms (for the record, I
>> checked rb3gen2 and FP5)
>
> Thanks!
>
> Regards
> Luca
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-22 14:46 [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: kodiak: Elite-ify LPASS macros Luca Weiss
2026-06-17 10:05 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-06-22 8:23 ` Luca Weiss
2026-09-18 14:43 ` Luca Weiss [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DLIISWYS60TX.BBXK30H05VRL@fairphone.com \
--to=luca.weiss@fairphone.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=cros-qcom-dts-watchers@chromium.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phone-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox