From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jdl@jdl.com>
Message-Id: <E1V1Nm3-000740-TB@jdl.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MAINTAINERS: Refactor device tree maintainership
In-reply-to: <51ED9694.9060303@gmail.com>
References: <1374290388-19308-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@linaro.org> <1374290388-19308-3-git-send-email-grant.likely@linaro.org> <51EC2EC7.6010001@gmail.com> <CACxGe6sGdkMuLFs3K_ERKot+ryTArs6qTiwpXNe+LyoAQ8HGDw@mail.gmail.com> <51ED9694.9060303@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:36:07 -0500
From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@jdl.com>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
List-ID: <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>

> 
> My own selfish desire is to easily separate emails for DT bindings and
> DT core code. I suppose I could do that with a suffix on my email address.

And I've had the reverse problem:  Sorting out the DTC
and libfdt patches from the noise. :-)

jdl