From: servpol@tuta.io
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Cc: "Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Linux Pm" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] power: supply: Add GL.iNet GL-E750 MCU battery driver
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 21:24:54 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <P6GQkBA--F-9@tuta.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <avEHPVdx0NlX4dhy@venus>
On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 12:35:58AM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> The Sashiko analysis looks correct:
>
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261005-gl-e750-mcu-v1-0-499d2e31f786%40tuta.io
Hi Sebastian,
thanks for looking at it. That link is the review of v1, and both
findings there are addressed in this v2 (see "Changes in v2" in the
cover letter):
- a new message (they all start with '{') now ends the previous one,
so an event that follows a status reply without a line ending is no
longer appended to it and lost;
- the poll work no longer clears the receive buffer, neither before the
request nor on the reply timeout; it only consumes a pending status
reply, so a partially received event stays in the buffer.
Sashiko's review of v2 reports no regressions:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261021-gl-e750-mcu-v2-0-9bd7e7c2e0e1%40tuta.io
If you meant something else in that analysis, please let me know and
I'll address it in v3.
Thanks,
Serv
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-21 19:33 [PATCH v2 0/2] power: supply: Add GL.iNet GL-E750 MCU battery driver Serv Pol via B4 Relay
2026-10-21 19:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: power: supply: Add GL.iNet GL-E750 MCU Serv Pol via B4 Relay
2026-10-21 19:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] power: supply: Add GL.iNet GL-E750 MCU battery driver Serv Pol via B4 Relay
2026-11-08 23:35 ` Sebastian Reichel
2026-11-12 20:24 ` servpol [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=P6GQkBA--F-9@tuta.io \
--to=servpol@tuta.io \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox