From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guennadi Liakhovetski Subject: Re: [ANN] Meeting minutes of the Cambourne meeting Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:59:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <201107261647.19235.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> <201108301742.56581.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201108301742.56581.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Laurent Pinchart Cc: Grant Likely , Mark Brown , Tomasz Stanislawski , Sylwester Nawrocki , Sakari Ailus , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-media , Hans Verkuil , Sylwester Nawrocki , Marek Szyprowski , Tuukka Toivonen List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > A dependency system is tempting but will be very complex to implement > properly, especially when faced with cyclic dependencies. For instance the > OMAP3 ISP driver requires the camera sensor device to be present to proceed, Switching to a notifier instead of waiting in probe() might be a good idea (TM). > and the camera sensor requires a clock provided by the OMAP3 ISP. To solve > this we need to probe the OMAP3 ISP first, have it register its clock devices, > and then wait until all sensors become available. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/