From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B77AC64E7C for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 10:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8192222A for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 10:46:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729491AbgLBKq3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2020 05:46:29 -0500 Received: from mo4-p02-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([85.215.255.81]:17658 "EHLO mo4-p02-ob.smtp.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729493AbgLBKq2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2020 05:46:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1606905816; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=gerhold.net; h=In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=mi/tsaIREtbmjW+UpYfbK8JOpgZQV3mq5I5ijHISdak=; b=pbXBLCR+RnEjuQGE64rPa08GcxDQtzzSFszgCka2jhDkeTiY1ycQbe7VtaDMH4Vb3t PV2tQ7LbamcaMX3pIz0noRxnMvkhuHbJI9y8OZFjRpT71Ebl+Zagor2kzQ8ygSQDE//b zpxIDIqf3FM5wWZE19XY4GItBzCOenB96XqWodVHy7Fr1UIy6hUmLPoOJL6bk9wzzgDi S9WgSg+FbUGnq4g6BECk+0eKf1zoJbemRUB9U7K2nfZnNyoNr9KXB6Pozk6+BNzvqJgP h4w/7xyIACLqV8kOGLw5h23qxUBJ3YWKuwA+RikfseKVHzVZeTQkhWPhfti4zA6pjI/v 9fTg== X-RZG-AUTH: ":P3gBZUipdd93FF5ZZvYFPugejmSTVR2nRPhVOQ/OcYgojyw4j34+u26zEodhPgRDZ8jxIc/Daoo=" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from gerhold.net by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 47.3.4 SBL|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id Z061efwB2AhZWxM (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate); Wed, 2 Dec 2020 11:43:35 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 11:43:28 +0100 From: Stephan Gerhold To: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Rob Herring , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: Add support for MPU-6880 Message-ID: References: <20201202101355.87112-1-stephan@gerhold.net> <20201202101355.87112-2-stephan@gerhold.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 10:28:12AM +0000, Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol wrote: > Hello Stephan, > > MPU-6880 is similar to MPU-6500. It should share the same registers map as far as I know. > > Seems good to me. Please also update Kconfig to add MPU6880 in the list for I2C and for SPI. > Great, thanks! Will send a v2 with the Kconfig change. Stephan