devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, 'Rob Herring ' <robh@kernel.org>,
	'Jisheng Zhang ' <jszhang@kernel.org>,
	'Anup Patel ' <apatel@ventanamicro.com>,
	'Conor Dooley ' <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	'Krzysztof Kozlowski ' <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	'Heiko Stuebner ' <heiko@sntech.de>,
	'Paul Walmsley ' <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	'Palmer Dabbelt ' <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	'Albert Ou ' <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	'Ben Dooks ' <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
	'Atish Patra ' <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] riscv: cpufeatures: Put the upper 16 bits of patch ID to work
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 17:27:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/ZQk0ifXPEnenoe@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230221190916.572454-6-ajones@ventanamicro.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4964 bytes --]

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 08:09:13PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> cpufeature IDs are consecutive integers starting at 26, so a 32-bit
> patch ID allows an aircraft carrier load of feature IDs. Repurposing
> the upper 16 bits still leaves a boat load of feature IDs and gains
> 16 bits which may be used to control patching on a per patch-site
> basis.
> 
> This will be initially used in Zicboz's application to clear_page(),
> as Zicboz's block size must also be considered. In that case, the
> upper 16-bit value's role will be to convey the maximum block size
> which the Zicboz clear_page() implementation supports.
> 
> cpufeature patch sites which need to check for the existence or
> absence of other cpufeatures may also be able to make use of this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h |  3 +++
>  arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c       | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h
> index 8f39d4e8598d..f2cb543b0bd2 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
>  #include <linux/stddef.h>
>  #include <asm/hwcap.h>
>  
> +#define PATCH_ID_CPUFEATURE_ID(p)		((u16)((u32)(p) & 0xffff))
> +#define PATCH_ID_CPUFEATURE_VALUE(p)		((u16)(((u32)(p) >> 16) & 0xffff))

I was just fiddling around a bit with macros, I think these do the same
thing:
#define PATCH_ID_CPUFEATURE_ID(p)		((p) & GENMASK(15, 0))
#define PATCH_ID_CPUFEATURE_VALUE(p)		FIELD_GET(GENMASK(31, 16), (p))
Although without the same care about types - is there a specific reason
you were casting like that?

Either way, I think I prefer this approach to the vendor_id stuffing!
If we do end up needing to fit an aircraft carrier, we can come back and
revisit another parameter in the alternatives I suppose...

I don't really know if the macros do anything to help with
understandability, so with or without trying to use macros:
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Thanks,
Conor.

>  #define RISCV_ALTERNATIVES_BOOT		0 /* alternatives applied during regular boot */
>  #define RISCV_ALTERNATIVES_MODULE	1 /* alternatives applied during module-init */
>  #define RISCV_ALTERNATIVES_EARLY_BOOT	2 /* alternatives applied before mmu start */
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 6102b6bb5db3..0594989ead63 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -273,12 +273,35 @@ void __init riscv_fill_hwcap(void)
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE
> +/*
> + * Alternative patch sites consider 48 bits when determining when to patch
> + * the old instruction sequence with the new. These bits are broken into a
> + * 16-bit vendor ID and a 32-bit patch ID. A non-zero vendor ID means the
> + * patch site is for an erratum, identified by the 32-bit patch ID. When
> + * the vendor ID is zero, the patch site is for a cpufeature. cpufeatures
> + * further break down patch ID into two 16-bit numbers. The lower 16 bits
> + * are the cpufeature ID and the upper 16 bits are used for a value specific
> + * to the cpufeature and patch site. If the upper 16 bits are zero, then it
> + * implies no specific value is specified. cpufeatures that want to control
> + * patching on a per-site basis will provide non-zero values and implement
> + * checks here. The checks return true when patching should be done, and
> + * false otherwise.
> + */
> +static bool riscv_cpufeature_patch_check(u16 id, u16 value)
> +{
> +	if (!value)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  void __init_or_module riscv_cpufeature_patch_func(struct alt_entry *begin,
>  						  struct alt_entry *end,
>  						  unsigned int stage)
>  {
>  	struct alt_entry *alt;
>  	void *oldptr, *altptr;
> +	u16 id, value;
>  
>  	if (stage == RISCV_ALTERNATIVES_EARLY_BOOT)
>  		return;
> @@ -286,13 +309,19 @@ void __init_or_module riscv_cpufeature_patch_func(struct alt_entry *begin,
>  	for (alt = begin; alt < end; alt++) {
>  		if (alt->vendor_id != 0)
>  			continue;
> -		if (alt->patch_id >= RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX) {
> -			WARN(1, "This extension id:%d is not in ISA extension list",
> -				alt->patch_id);
> +
> +		id = PATCH_ID_CPUFEATURE_ID(alt->patch_id);
> +
> +		if (id >= RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX) {
> +			WARN(1, "This extension id:%d is not in ISA extension list", id);
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (!__riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, alt->patch_id))
> +		if (!__riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, id))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		value = PATCH_ID_CPUFEATURE_VALUE(alt->patch_id);
> +		if (!riscv_cpufeature_patch_check(id, value))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		oldptr = ALT_OLD_PTR(alt);
> -- 
> 2.39.1
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-22 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-21 19:09 [PATCH v5 0/8] RISC-V: Apply Zicboz to clear_page Andrew Jones
2023-02-21 19:09 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] RISC-V: alternatives: Support patching multiple insns in assembly Andrew Jones
2023-02-21 19:09 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] RISC-V: Factor out body of riscv_init_cbom_blocksize loop Andrew Jones
2023-02-21 19:09 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] dt-bindings: riscv: Document cboz-block-size Andrew Jones
2023-02-21 19:09 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] RISC-V: Add Zicboz detection and block size parsing Andrew Jones
2023-02-21 19:09 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] riscv: cpufeatures: Put the upper 16 bits of patch ID to work Andrew Jones
2023-02-22 17:27   ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2023-02-23 12:53     ` Andrew Jones
2023-02-21 19:09 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] RISC-V: Use Zicboz in clear_page when available Andrew Jones
2023-02-24 14:00   ` Ben Dooks
2023-02-24 14:25     ` Andrew Jones
2023-02-24 14:36       ` Andrew Jones
2023-02-21 19:09 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] RISC-V: KVM: Provide UAPI for Zicboz block size Andrew Jones
2023-02-21 19:09 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] RISC-V: KVM: Expose Zicboz to the guest Andrew Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y/ZQk0ifXPEnenoe@spud \
    --to=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).