* [PATCH v2 0/1] Fix kmemleak crashes when scanning CMA regions @ 2023-02-08 23:19 Isaac J. Manjarres 2023-02-08 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] of: reserved_mem: Have kmemleak ignore dynamically allocated reserved mem Isaac J. Manjarres 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Isaac J. Manjarres @ 2023-02-08 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rob Herring, Frank Rowand, Russell King (Oracle), Mike Rapoport, Kirill A. Shutemov, Nick Kossifidis, Catalin Marinas Cc: Andrew Morton, Saravana Kannan, linux-mm, Isaac J. Manjarres, kernel-team, Rafael J. Wysocki, devicetree, linux-kernel When trying to boot a device with an ARM64 kernel with the following config options enabled: CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC=y CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC_ENABLE_DEFAULT=y CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK=y a crash is encountered when kmemleak starts to scan the list of gray or allocated objects that it maintains. Upon closer inspection, it was observed that these page-faults always occurred when kmemleak attempted to scan a CMA region. At the moment, kmemleak is made aware of CMA regions that are specified through the devicetree to be dynamically allocated within a range of addresses. However, kmemleak should not need to scan CMA regions or any reserved memory region, as those regions can be used for DMA transfers between drivers and peripherals, and thus wouldn't contain anything useful for kmemleak. Additionally, since CMA regions are unmapped from the kernel's address space when they are freed to the buddy allocator at boot when CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is enabled, kmemleak shouldn't attempt to access those memory regions, as that will trigger a crash. Thus, kmemleak should ignore all dynamically allocated reserved memory regions. v1 ==> v2: - Simplified the original approach of informing kmemleak about all CMA regions in the system to just having kmemleak ignore CMA regions it is currently aware of. Isaac J. Manjarres (1): of: reserved_mem: Have kmemleak ignore dynamically allocated reserved mem drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.39.1.581.gbfd45094c4-goog ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/1] of: reserved_mem: Have kmemleak ignore dynamically allocated reserved mem 2023-02-08 23:19 [PATCH v2 0/1] Fix kmemleak crashes when scanning CMA regions Isaac J. Manjarres @ 2023-02-08 23:20 ` Isaac J. Manjarres 2023-02-09 5:59 ` Mike Rapoport 2023-02-09 18:55 ` Catalin Marinas 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Isaac J. Manjarres @ 2023-02-08 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rob Herring, Frank Rowand, Russell King (Oracle), Mike Rapoport, Kirill A. Shutemov, Nick Kossifidis, Catalin Marinas, Andrew Morton Cc: Saravana Kannan, linux-mm, Isaac J. Manjarres, kernel-team, Rafael J. Wysocki, devicetree, linux-kernel, stable, Rob Herring Currently, kmemleak ignores dynamically allocated reserved memory regions that don't have a kernel mapping. However, regions that do retain a kernel mapping (e.g. CMA regions) do get scanned by kmemleak. This is not ideal for two reasons: 1. kmemleak works by scanning memory regions for pointers to allocated objects to determine if those objects have been leaked or not. However, reserved memory regions can be used between drivers and peripherals for DMA transfers, and thus, would not contain pointers to allocated objects, making it unnecessary for kmemleak to scan these reserved memory regions. 2. When CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is enabled, along with kmemleak, the CMA reserved memory regions are unmapped from the kernel's address space when they are freed to buddy at boot. These CMA reserved regions are still tracked by kmemleak, however, and when kmemleak attempts to scan them, a crash will happen, as accessing the CMA region will result in a page-fault, since the regions are unmapped. Thus, use kmemleak_ignore_phys() for all dynamically allocated reserved memory regions, instead of those that do not have a kernel mapping associated with them. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.15+ Fixes: a7259df76702 ("memblock: make memblock_find_in_range method private") Signed-off-by: Isaac J. Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@google.com> --- drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c index 65f3b02a0e4e..f90975e00446 100644 --- a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c +++ b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c @@ -48,9 +48,10 @@ static int __init early_init_dt_alloc_reserved_memory_arch(phys_addr_t size, err = memblock_mark_nomap(base, size); if (err) memblock_phys_free(base, size); - kmemleak_ignore_phys(base); } + kmemleak_ignore_phys(base); + return err; } -- 2.39.1.581.gbfd45094c4-goog ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] of: reserved_mem: Have kmemleak ignore dynamically allocated reserved mem 2023-02-08 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] of: reserved_mem: Have kmemleak ignore dynamically allocated reserved mem Isaac J. Manjarres @ 2023-02-09 5:59 ` Mike Rapoport 2023-02-09 18:55 ` Catalin Marinas 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Mike Rapoport @ 2023-02-09 5:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Isaac J. Manjarres Cc: Rob Herring, Frank Rowand, Russell King (Oracle), Kirill A. Shutemov, Nick Kossifidis, Catalin Marinas, Andrew Morton, Saravana Kannan, linux-mm, kernel-team, Rafael J. Wysocki, devicetree, linux-kernel, stable, Rob Herring On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 03:20:00PM -0800, Isaac J. Manjarres wrote: > Currently, kmemleak ignores dynamically allocated reserved memory > regions that don't have a kernel mapping. However, regions that do > retain a kernel mapping (e.g. CMA regions) do get scanned by kmemleak. > > This is not ideal for two reasons: > > 1. kmemleak works by scanning memory regions for pointers to > allocated objects to determine if those objects have been leaked > or not. However, reserved memory regions can be used between drivers > and peripherals for DMA transfers, and thus, would not contain pointers > to allocated objects, making it unnecessary for kmemleak to scan > these reserved memory regions. > > 2. When CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is enabled, along with kmemleak, the > CMA reserved memory regions are unmapped from the kernel's address > space when they are freed to buddy at boot. These CMA reserved regions > are still tracked by kmemleak, however, and when kmemleak attempts to > scan them, a crash will happen, as accessing the CMA region will result > in a page-fault, since the regions are unmapped. > > Thus, use kmemleak_ignore_phys() for all dynamically allocated reserved > memory regions, instead of those that do not have a kernel mapping > associated with them. > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.15+ > Fixes: a7259df76702 ("memblock: make memblock_find_in_range method private") > Signed-off-by: Isaac J. Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@google.com> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> > --- > drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c > index 65f3b02a0e4e..f90975e00446 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c > +++ b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c > @@ -48,9 +48,10 @@ static int __init early_init_dt_alloc_reserved_memory_arch(phys_addr_t size, > err = memblock_mark_nomap(base, size); > if (err) > memblock_phys_free(base, size); > - kmemleak_ignore_phys(base); > } > > + kmemleak_ignore_phys(base); > + > return err; > } > > -- > 2.39.1.581.gbfd45094c4-goog > -- Sincerely yours, Mike. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] of: reserved_mem: Have kmemleak ignore dynamically allocated reserved mem 2023-02-08 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] of: reserved_mem: Have kmemleak ignore dynamically allocated reserved mem Isaac J. Manjarres 2023-02-09 5:59 ` Mike Rapoport @ 2023-02-09 18:55 ` Catalin Marinas 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Catalin Marinas @ 2023-02-09 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Isaac J. Manjarres Cc: Rob Herring, Frank Rowand, Russell King (Oracle), Mike Rapoport, Kirill A. Shutemov, Nick Kossifidis, Andrew Morton, Saravana Kannan, linux-mm, kernel-team, Rafael J. Wysocki, devicetree, linux-kernel, stable, Rob Herring On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 03:20:00PM -0800, Isaac J. Manjarres wrote: > Currently, kmemleak ignores dynamically allocated reserved memory > regions that don't have a kernel mapping. However, regions that do > retain a kernel mapping (e.g. CMA regions) do get scanned by kmemleak. > > This is not ideal for two reasons: > > 1. kmemleak works by scanning memory regions for pointers to > allocated objects to determine if those objects have been leaked > or not. However, reserved memory regions can be used between drivers > and peripherals for DMA transfers, and thus, would not contain pointers > to allocated objects, making it unnecessary for kmemleak to scan > these reserved memory regions. > > 2. When CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is enabled, along with kmemleak, the > CMA reserved memory regions are unmapped from the kernel's address > space when they are freed to buddy at boot. These CMA reserved regions > are still tracked by kmemleak, however, and when kmemleak attempts to > scan them, a crash will happen, as accessing the CMA region will result > in a page-fault, since the regions are unmapped. > > Thus, use kmemleak_ignore_phys() for all dynamically allocated reserved > memory regions, instead of those that do not have a kernel mapping > associated with them. > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.15+ > Fixes: a7259df76702 ("memblock: make memblock_find_in_range method private") > Signed-off-by: Isaac J. Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@google.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-02-09 18:55 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-02-08 23:19 [PATCH v2 0/1] Fix kmemleak crashes when scanning CMA regions Isaac J. Manjarres 2023-02-08 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] of: reserved_mem: Have kmemleak ignore dynamically allocated reserved mem Isaac J. Manjarres 2023-02-09 5:59 ` Mike Rapoport 2023-02-09 18:55 ` Catalin Marinas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).