Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] iio: accel: Support Kionix/ROHM KX022A accelerometer

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 02:37:15PM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> KX022A is a 3-axis accelerometer from ROHM/Kionix. The sensor features
> include variable ODRs, I2C and SPI control, FIFO/LIFO with watermark IRQ,
> tap/motion detection, wake-up & back-to-sleep events, four acceleration
> ranges (2, 4, 8 and 16g) and probably some other cool features.
> 
> Add support for the basic accelerometer features such as getting the
> acceleration data via IIO. (raw reads, triggered buffer [data-ready] or
> using the WMI IRQ).
> 
> Important things to be added include the double-tap, motion
> detection and wake-up as well as the runtime power management.

...

> +	if (!i2c->irq) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "No IRQ configured\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;

At least

	return dev_err_probe(...);

for know error codes (or when we know that there won't be EPROBE_DEFER), takes
less LoCs in the source file.

> +	}

...

> +	regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(i2c, &kx022a_regmap);
> +	if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize Regmap\n");
> +		return PTR_ERR(regmap);

Ditto here and anywhere else for the similar cases.

> +	}

...

> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> +		*vals = (const int *)kx022a_accel_samp_freq_table;
> +		*length = ARRAY_SIZE(kx022a_accel_samp_freq_table) * 2;
> +		*type = IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> +		return IIO_AVAIL_LIST;
> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> +		*vals = (const int *)kx022a_scale_table;
> +		*length = ARRAY_SIZE(kx022a_scale_table) * 2;
> +		*type = IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> +		return IIO_AVAIL_LIST;

These  ' * 2' can be replaced with respective ARRAY_SIZE() of nested element
for robustness, but I don't think it worth it. What we need is to provide
IIO specific type for these tables and use it.

...

> +static int kx022a_turn_on_off_unlocked(struct kx022a_data *data, bool on)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (on)
> +		ret = regmap_set_bits(data->regmap, KX022A_REG_CNTL,
> +				      KX022A_MASK_PC1);
> +	else
> +		ret = regmap_clear_bits(data->regmap, KX022A_REG_CNTL,
> +					KX022A_MASK_PC1);
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_err(data->dev, "Turn %s fail %d\n", (on) ? "ON" : "OFF",
> +			ret);

str_on_off() ?

> +	return ret;
> +
> +}

...

> +	switch (mask) {
> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> +		n = ARRAY_SIZE(kx022a_accel_samp_freq_table);
> +
> +		while (n--)
> +			if (val == kx022a_accel_samp_freq_table[n][0] &&
> +			    kx022a_accel_samp_freq_table[n][1] == val2)

Why not to use the same kind of l and r arguments in == lines?
In current form it's a bit harder to see what the catch here.

> +				break;
> +		if (n < 0) {
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			goto unlock_out;
> +		}
> +		ret = kx022a_turn_off_lock(data);
> +		if (ret)
> +			break;
> +
> +		ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap,
> +					 KX022A_REG_ODCNTL,
> +					 KX022A_MASK_ODR, n);
> +		data->odr_ns = kx022a_odrs[n];
> +		kx022a_turn_on_unlock(data);
> +		break;
> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> +		n = ARRAY_SIZE(kx022a_scale_table);
> +
> +		while (n-- > 0)
> +			if (val == kx022a_scale_table[n][0] &&
> +			    kx022a_scale_table[n][1] == val2)

Ditto.

> +				break;
> +		if (n < 0) {
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			goto unlock_out;
> +		}
> +
> +		ret = kx022a_turn_off_lock(data);
> +		if (ret)
> +			break;
> +
> +		ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, KX022A_REG_CNTL,
> +					 KX022A_MASK_GSEL,
> +					 n << KX022A_GSEL_SHIFT);
> +		kx022a_turn_on_unlock(data);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		break;
> +	}

...

> +static int kx022a_get_axis(struct kx022a_data *data,
> +			   struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> +			   int *val)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = regmap_bulk_read(data->regmap, chan->address, &data->buffer,
> +			       sizeof(__le16));
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	*val = le16_to_cpu(data->buffer[0]);

'p'-variant of the above would look better

	*val = le16_to_cpup(data->buffer);

since it will be the same as above address without any additional arithmetics.

> +	return IIO_VAL_INT;
> +}


...

> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> +		ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, KX022A_REG_ODCNTL, &regval);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		if ((regval & KX022A_MASK_ODR) >
> +		    ARRAY_SIZE(kx022a_accel_samp_freq_table)) {
> +			dev_err(data->dev, "Invalid ODR\n");
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
> +		kx022a_reg2freq(regval, val, val2);

> +		ret = IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> +
> +		break;

return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;

> +
> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> +		ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, KX022A_REG_CNTL, &regval);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		kx022a_reg2scale(regval, val, val2);
> +
> +		ret = IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> +		break;

Ditto.

...

> +	return regmap_write(data->regmap, KX022A_REG_BUF_CLEAR, 0x0);

Would simple '0' suffice?

...

> +	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> +		int bit;
> +		u16 *samples = &buffer[i * 3];

I would put it as

		u16 *samples = &buffer[i * 3];
		int bit;

> +		for_each_set_bit(bit, idev->active_scan_mask, AXIS_MAX)
> +			memcpy(&data->scan.channels[bit], &samples[bit],
> +			       sizeof(data->scan.channels[0]));

Why not use bit instead of 0 for the sake of consistency?

Also might be good to have a temporary for channels:

		... *chs = data->scan.channels;


		for_each_set_bit(bit, idev->active_scan_mask, AXIS_MAX)
			memcpy(&chs[bit], &samples[bit], sizeof(chs[bit]));

> +		iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(idev, &data->scan, tstamp);
> +
> +		tstamp += sample_period;
> +	}

...

> +	ret = regmap_clear_bits(data->regmap, data->ien_reg,
> +				KX022A_MASK_WMI);

I don't see why it's not on a single line. Even if you are a conservative
adept of 80.

Maybe other lines also need to be revised?

> +	if (ret)
> +		goto unlock_out;

...

> +	int ret = IRQ_NONE;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
> +
> +	if (data->trigger_enabled) {
> +		iio_trigger_poll_chained(data->trig);
> +		ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (data->state & KX022A_STATE_FIFO) {

> +		ret = __kx022a_fifo_flush(idev, KX022A_FIFO_LENGTH, true);
> +		if (ret > 0)
> +			ret = IRQ_HANDLED;

I don't like it. Perhaps

	bool handled = false;
	int ret;

	...
		ret = ...
		if (ret > 0)
			handled = true;
	...

	return IRQ_RETVAL(handled);

> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> +
> +	return ret;

...

> +	if (!dev)
> +		return -ENODEV;

Do you really need this check?

...

> +	fw = dev_fwnode(dev);
> +	if (!fw)
> +		return -ENODEV;

You may combine these two in one.

	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;


	fwnode = dev ? dev_fwnode(dev) : NULL;
	if (!fwnode)
		return -ENODEV;

And please, call it fwnode.

...

> +	irq = fwnode_irq_get_byname(fw, "INT1");
> +	if (irq > 0) {
> +		data->inc_reg = KX022A_REG_INC1;
> +		data->ien_reg = KX022A_REG_INC4;
> +
> +		if (fwnode_irq_get_byname(dev_fwnode(dev), "INT2") > 0)

Why not use fwnode again

> +			dev_warn(dev, "Only one IRQ supported\n");
> +	} else {
> +		irq = fwnode_irq_get_byname(dev_fwnode(dev), "INT2");

Ditto.

> +		if (irq <= 0)
> +			return dev_err_probe(dev, irq, "No suitable IRQ\n");
> +
> +		data->inc_reg = KX022A_REG_INC5;
> +		data->ien_reg = KX022A_REG_INC6;
> +	}

...

> +	if (ret)
> +		return dev_err_probe(data->dev, ret,
> +				     "iio_triggered_buffer_setup_ext FAIL %d\n",
> +				     ret);

Drop dup ret at the end, dev_err_probe() has been adding it to each message.

...

> +	/*
> +	 * No need to check for NULL. request_threadedI_irq() defaults to
> +	 * dev_name() should the alloc fail.
> +	 */
> +	name = devm_kasprintf(data->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s-kx022a",
> +			      dev_name(data->dev));

It's not clear why do you need a suffix here.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko