Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: rename i2c5 to i2c21

[Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 03:54:05PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Note that the node is labelled qup2_i2c5 and not qup_i2c5.
> 
> That is, the QUP nodes are labelled using two indices, and specifically
> 
> 	qup2_i2c5
> 
> would be another name for
> 
> 	qup_i2c21
> 
> if we'd been using such a flat naming scheme (there are 8 engines per
> QUP).
> 
> So there's nothing wrong with how these nodes are currently named, but
> mixing the two scheme as you are suggesting would not be correct.

Hi Johan,

What would I use for the name in the aliases section? Right now I have:

    aliases {
        i2c18 = &qup2_i2c18;
    }

So qup2_i2c18 becomes qup2_i2c2. Would I use the flat naming scheme for
the alias like so?

    aliases {
        i2c18 = &qup2_i2c2;
    }

Brian