From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04683C433E6 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD29922C7D for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:40:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727470AbhAOIk5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2021 03:40:57 -0500 Received: from mo4-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([85.215.255.54]:11316 "EHLO mo4-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727349AbhAOIk4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2021 03:40:56 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1610699882; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=gerhold.net; h=In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From: Subject:Sender; bh=/ES9AWFZgX/EjpanHclUGFBICYc1TRJYxOhIwf3/NGY=; b=qPdMbi5vCh3JClgG7+W19z9NqpWwkLUD7U7eV3iXZhVl5OdyngiCsenNze4Tp9EVwM DSJukjvp5V6WGN8XQbwfbtKXLdmu+w7riU/SNaZEoVPZrwkUtXO/u924FOU+ptkhk4Z1 bvDZ5aICa1ZDuGtrrqGeBzH6oE9YDB46Abl0lamgVRKwoZ7c8XscoQBhc+MYXsac1dch EhpvHGTl+zrSq4lg3HmCB3leccNtiJmDZEb7M5isOBplOYbvZDgSaLrf4GdAUNopYDtT 2bxJLXv8o3cTbAswDdW4tSC50+n80x+n2MRBRNQ9mdl6Y/+Ic5PM3gsE6v4PPVZXh1k8 aWFg== X-RZG-AUTH: ":P3gBZUipdd93FF5ZZvYFPugejmSTVR2nRPhVOQ/OcYgojyw4j34+u26zEodhPgRDZ8j6IczBboo=" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from gerhold.net by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 47.12.1 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id R0a218x0F8bloto (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate); Fri, 15 Jan 2021 09:37:47 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 09:37:42 +0100 From: Stephan Gerhold To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Rob Herring , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Lars-Peter Clausen , Linus Walleij , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: accel: bma255: Fix bmc150/bmi055 compatible Message-ID: References: <20201202083551.7753-1-stephan@gerhold.net> <20201209181739.GA708144@robh.at.kernel.org> <20201213132514.00d7ffff@archlinux> <20210114205937.11e650d0@archlinux> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210114205937.11e650d0@archlinux> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 08:59:37PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 13:25:14 +0000 > Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 12:17:39 -0600 > > Rob Herring wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 02 Dec 2020 09:35:51 +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > > > > The bmc150-accel-i2c.c driver has an "_accel" suffix for the > > > > compatibles of BMC150 and BMI055. This is necessary because BMC150 > > > > contains both accelerometer (bosch,bmc150_accel) and magnetometer > > > > (bosch,bmc150_magn) and therefore "bosch,bmc150" would be ambiguous. > > > > > > > > However, the binding documentation suggests using "bosch,bmc150". > > > > Add the "_accel" suffix for BMC150 and BMI055 so the binding docs > > > > match what is expected by the driver. > > > > > > > > Cc: Linus Walleij > > > > Fixes: 496a39526fce8 ("iio: accel: bmc150-accel: Add DT bindings") > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold > > > > --- > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/bosch,bma255.yaml | 4 ++-- > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring > > Applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git which is now based on stuff > > queued up for the merge window. I'll send a pull not long after rc1. > > > > Not sure why, but the Fixes tag above is invalid. > I think we can call this a "race condition" :) I sent the patch on Dec 02 and you rebased the patch on Dec 03 for "iio-for-5.11b-take2" (because some sign offs were missing there). My patch simply refers to the old commit hash. Stephan