From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45594C47089 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 09:09:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1AB61355 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 09:09:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235538AbhE0JK7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2021 05:10:59 -0400 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:60950 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235475AbhE0JK6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2021 05:10:58 -0400 Received: from atomide.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F289180A8; Thu, 27 May 2021 09:09:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 12:09:21 +0300 From: Tony Lindgren To: Grygorii Strashko Cc: Gowtham Tammana , Suman Anna , bcousson@baylibre.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Nisanth Menon Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: dra7: Fix duplicate USB4 target module node Message-ID: References: <20210526213035.15448-1-g-tammana@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org * Grygorii Strashko [210527 09:03]: > On 27/05/2021 08:48, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > But let's keep the target-module@140000 here as it puts it in the right > > location rather than directly on the ocp. Let's mark it with > > status = "disabled" in dra7-l4.dtsi, and add a comment noting it's only > > available on dra74x. So similar to what you had in your v1 patch, except > > disabled. > > My preference would be not to mix SoC variant specific modules in common module, > and fix dra74x instead by placing usb4 node in proper place: > > &l4_per3 { /* 0x48800000 */ > segment@0 { > --> Yeah that's even better, and leaves out status = "disabled". Sounds good to me. Regards, Tony