From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peda@axentia.se
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: mux: pca954x: Support multiple devices on a single reset line
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 14:46:02 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQhZimPDbNJk5nbR@robh.at.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210727160315.15575-3-eajames@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 11:03:15AM -0500, Eddie James wrote:
> Some systems connect several PCA954x devices to a single reset GPIO. For
> these devices to get out of reset and probe successfully, each device must
> defer the probe until the GPIO has been hogged. Accomplish this by
> attempting to grab a new "reset-shared-hogged" devicetree property, but
> expect it to fail with EPROBE_DEFER or EBUSY.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
> index 4ad665757dd8..376b54ffb590 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
> @@ -434,15 +434,43 @@ static int pca954x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> i2c_set_clientdata(client, muxc);
> data->client = client;
>
> - /* Reset the mux if a reset GPIO is specified. */
> - gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> - if (IS_ERR(gpio))
> - return PTR_ERR(gpio);
> - if (gpio) {
> - udelay(1);
> - gpiod_set_value_cansleep(gpio, 0);
> - /* Give the chip some time to recover. */
> - udelay(1);
> + /*
> + * Grab the shared, hogged gpio that controls the mux reset. We expect
> + * this to fail with either EPROBE_DEFER or EBUSY. The only purpose of
> + * trying to get it is to make sure the gpio controller has probed up
> + * and hogged the line to take the mux out of reset, meaning that the
> + * mux is ready to be probed up. Don't try and set the line any way; in
> + * the event we actually successfully get the line (if it wasn't
> + * hogged) then we immediately release it, since there is no way to
> + * sync up the line between muxes.
> + */
> + gpio = gpiod_get_optional(dev, "reset-shared-hogged", 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(gpio)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(gpio);
> + if (ret != -EBUSY)
> + return ret;
Why can't you just do this with the existing 'reset-gpios' property?
What's the usecase where you'd want to fail probe because EBUSY other
than an error in your DT.
> + } else {
> + if (gpio) {
> + /* This is really a problem since now we don't know the
> + * state of the gpio. Log a warning and keep trying to
> + * probe the mux just in case it works.
> + */
> + dev_warn(dev, "got hogged reset line, expect error\n");
> + gpiod_put(gpio);
> + } else {
> + /* Reset the mux if a reset GPIO is specified. */
> + gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "reset",
> + GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> + if (IS_ERR(gpio))
> + return PTR_ERR(gpio);
> +
> + if (gpio) {
> + udelay(1);
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(gpio, 0);
> + /* Give the chip some time to recover. */
> + udelay(1);
> + }
> + }
> }
>
> data->chip = device_get_match_data(dev);
> --
> 2.27.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-02 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-27 16:03 [PATCH v2 0/2] i2c: mux: pca954x: Support multiple devices on a single reset line Eddie James
2021-07-27 16:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-mux-pca954x: Define the reset-shared-hogged gpio Eddie James
2021-07-27 16:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: mux: pca954x: Support multiple devices on a single reset line Eddie James
2021-08-02 20:46 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2021-08-02 21:51 ` Eddie James
2021-08-02 22:35 ` Rob Herring
2021-08-04 7:50 ` Peter Rosin
2021-08-04 13:28 ` Rob Herring
2021-08-04 15:12 ` Eddie James
2021-08-04 16:35 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YQhZimPDbNJk5nbR@robh.at.kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eajames@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peda@axentia.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).