Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add bindings for HiKey 970 PCIe PHY

[Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>]

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 06:38:58AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Document the bindings for HiKey 970 (hi3670) PCIe PHY
> interface, supported via the pcie-kirin driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
> ---
>  .../phy/hisilicon,phy-hi3670-pcie.yaml        | 86 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 86 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/hisilicon,phy-hi3670-pcie.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/hisilicon,phy-hi3670-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/hisilicon,phy-hi3670-pcie.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1e0153e4f4a5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/hisilicon,phy-hi3670-pcie.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/hisilicon,phy-hi3670-pcie.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: HiSilicon Kirin970 PCIe PHY
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
> +
> +description: |+
> +  Bindings for PCIe PHY on HiSilicon Kirin 970.
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: hisilicon,hi970-pcie-phy
> +
> +  "#phy-cells":
> +    const: 0
> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +    description: PHY Control registers
> +
> +  phy-supply:
> +    description: The PCIe PHY power supply
> +
> +  clocks:
> +    items:
> +      - description: PCIe PHY clock
> +      - description: PCIe AUX clock
> +      - description: PCIe APB PHY clock
> +      - description: PCIe APB SYS clock
> +      - description: PCIe ACLK clock
> +
> +  clock-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: phy_ref
> +      - const: aux
> +      - const: apb_phy
> +      - const: apb_sys
> +      - const: aclk
> +
> +  clkreq-gpios:
> +    description: Clock request GPIOs
> +    maxItems: 3

This can be dropped now?

If not, at least use the same property name. (But really, why duplicate 
information in DT).

Rob