From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3C7C433FE for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 17:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1B360F14 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 17:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233562AbhIGR7Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2021 13:59:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35248 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S245397AbhIGR7W (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2021 13:59:22 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA5E4C0613C1 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:58:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id s29so8776247pfw.5 for ; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 10:58:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=PH1/NKWKuIiK/UQ47Tpc0NCIfzOWPlskXSl+3rTMkTk=; b=P4QJo7HX5Djs/rgkb0gb3ueWcGU/Mut6ahkSnXfIIIjCSx2nvn0E3xJX9OAVFveJm8 vL7UXndabvBoMDUAF4ILEnMc0hZMtNtFdrh9zlAPdArwxgZCV2LH4PsR0RKVYC0PjPIG d5zgyfGHrv4zwfYikaI+0PTFQG3yE0KnlYufY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=PH1/NKWKuIiK/UQ47Tpc0NCIfzOWPlskXSl+3rTMkTk=; b=soQHXKkQtZPpdbai/syj8R9UGRE+9AXv/GGNeCOgoY+VVakHbYiHqMDL39ucjLGyWO o69wPXeCoQPQ3rLpfuzd3tBjpib4x9OZ47n/xjAmmGlW5/iy4SZqMVYIRiBiIkNka/x7 Sq2pa/FWNQh/0DcLVTL1Um5+nXxsI19seWrygFUE8i9Fbwi4kkAFkNkbvqDgFeXTPYhv F3xAXFB3/G5csdDvl4FFiKz3cPRuvKlDWJU9TRPeRa3RoonsHhnniNsMoXgxjKpFR3lA 0jKmispD8uJ9wwgIErn8zzTbEiv43DHFglpMrqDKmHMHyG8OK31EOSQg5nRG+w6FgIqm 6fbg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532fUbQlsOr57iUBTeMbR1XtgqgcANGzyo4uBSFvHAXQo1aiyCTb YZ/f5FApse3Hp1cxl9bN0FLGFg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxA3EKtCvWRbZmpp3xfkg33qPrCEleuHwhs6jqT4ojh2nloHdOTk5H7UFwjYOOXUPirqHb/xw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:a54f:: with SMTP id r15mr18064078pgu.11.1631037495285; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 10:58:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:15c:202:201:c6b2:7ae:474d:36f6]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id d13sm11186217pfn.114.2021.09.07.10.58.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Sep 2021 10:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:58:13 -0700 From: Matthias Kaehlcke To: satya priya Cc: Pavel Machek , Rob Herring , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , swboyd@chromium.org, kgunda@codeaurora.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] leds: Add pm8350c support to Qualcomm LPG driver Message-ID: References: <1630924867-4663-1-git-send-email-skakit@codeaurora.org> <1630924867-4663-3-git-send-email-skakit@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 10:54:18AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 04:11:06PM +0530, satya priya wrote: > > Add pm8350c compatible and lpg_data to the driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: satya priya > > --- > > drivers/leds/rgb/leds-qcom-lpg.c | 10 ++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > That driver does not exist in upstream or -next. Looks like this is a > patch from some downstream tree, which you should not use as base for > sending patches upstream. > > It seems you need to send patches for the entire driver + bindings. Sorry, my bad, I should have read the cover letter, which mentions the dependency on https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=505483&archive=both&state=*