From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6470FC433F5 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 17:21:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC8C61A03 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 17:21:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236295AbhKPRXz (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 12:23:55 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51602 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235906AbhKPRXy (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 12:23:54 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com (mail-ed1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB3ADC061570 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:20:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id w1so25055217edc.6 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:20:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Y7/ymhGPjLSJyJ+YNwQEo5utnlZQVkYRG4UA4vbBNwE=; b=Z6E7Zuy9PVFwXGePFb9KxhGg+daLtMwLGjckBQ7b2vySbEEd1DJ0lUYC6pLSnm7zSy kXaweByb8FcJBWyKrE0jB3m51ljQqHMdGCk7ZkQqVUt+khzHBmkhOhYe1GeFo2W6Nsso vazqnh/kK2bGZ911xdksNeaXzz4+eRLENNElhVi8yJ2J5xEZwstLoQikqgkyc4PHcOjs XhCdev6ycGAfTq4vNwHJOk+sXDN1s+oVbuSatxxkOwnnFrHnGr8o0dVBJWdYc+XtttBs NI6LHtNi5BKXpHXhsMPWOn1q/Bomz5sn42rCzH5vIJIZ7JDKmxvWD/Nouai7ne9MAmAZ Va+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Y7/ymhGPjLSJyJ+YNwQEo5utnlZQVkYRG4UA4vbBNwE=; b=kZXZYUHHz6RQ96XVljOiwcXw2Z6rPyKjUXmL588m/W6k4im/zY0qVAE5v2hNX5Wh5A 4hxEhG7K6Ig1YSMCHlEDtwTgJeyRlBB5GOLZwsyCMv7ZfkRpkzJa7RKYiba5vj65DQcS XcbnJPQx83eYlQRfyDDXyL02GMRVm16gtgARuUaQxg874DOCSLPt/hYM6n+s6RTSVPRE udQmVM7Li+UtOGJT91bUqDqwzJR5eaDwXouHj8g3JR27d34/4gQLVeyxAT/BUIYbt050 0HwBvjsF62S9e0shbHc6smgQ1EM4w38QCpvaO690YUZkT12QRuJIsO+t3kwNoMyeb9Ha ObNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531EaVK7uEfoQ51qj9LMg603+yI4HdJJUaRi67ehf3UTgaY/7834 0/FGAKnOTCrdAz58ACSR0FuiHhbzLaRhCA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJysrk4hn2MXFU1z+7fNFOPzdwH3NRQbppL+rDRVzDdxxgEucQ2rht9F4+xHJqZt9Jy1xcVSqg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:629b:: with SMTP id nd27mr12055773ejc.24.1637083255412; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:20:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from myrica (cpc92880-cmbg19-2-0-cust679.5-4.cable.virginm.net. [82.27.106.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j3sm8344871ejo.2.2021.11.16.09.20.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:20:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 17:20:33 +0000 From: Jean-Philippe Brucker To: Robin Murphy Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, will@kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, jkchen@linux.alibaba.com, leo.yan@linaro.org, uchida.jun@socionext.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] perf/smmuv3: Support devicetree Message-ID: References: <20211116113536.69758-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org> <3b5cb536-5a11-5096-4369-cec3d369ec52@arm.com> <54be6173-59d3-7ce8-e04b-b5197fdc0e10@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54be6173-59d3-7ce8-e04b-b5197fdc0e10@arm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 05:00:14PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 2021-11-16 15:42, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 12:02:47PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > > > On 2021-11-16 11:35, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > > > > Add devicetree binding for the SMMUv3 PMU, called Performance Monitoring > > > > Counter Group (PMCG) in the spec. Each SMMUv3 implementation can have > > > > multiple independent PMCGs, for example one for the Translation Control > > > > Unit (TCU) and one per Translation Buffer Unit (TBU). > > > > > > > > I previously sent the binding as reply to Jay Chen's thread implementing > > > > device tree support [1]. This posting addresses the comments from that > > > > thread. > > > > > > Ha, I'd also resurrected this and was planning to post it at some point this > > > week[0] - you should have said :) > > > > Ah sorry about that, I just resent because there was some demand for it at > > Linaro > > Heh, no worries - it's not like you were even CC'ed on the thread where I > only mentioned I *might* do it. > > Can I get away with being cheeky and just saying that my review comments are > the diff between my branch and yours, I wonder... Sure, that works for me, I'll send a v2 this week or so Thanks, Jean