From: "Gabriel L. Somlo" <gsomlo@gmail.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Karol Gugala <kgugala@antmicro.com>,
Mateusz Holenko <mholenko@antmicro.com>,
Kamil Rakoczy <krakoczy@antmicro.com>,
mdudek@internships.antmicro.com,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
david.abdurachmanov@sifive.com,
Florent Kermarrec <florent@enjoy-digital.fr>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mmc: Add driver for LiteX's LiteSDCard interface
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 16:30:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ya/SbwzYUD3gwwOL@errol.ini.cmu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWQryaYmbaakx3oFHMcuN4==ScPJBmxzbp+ewVqiqnbDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Geert,
I think I figured out a solution, see below:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 03:16:22PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 3:10 PM Gabriel L. Somlo <gsomlo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 01:24:49PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 9:41 PM Gabriel Somlo <gsomlo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > LiteX (https://github.com/enjoy-digital/litex) is a SoC framework
> > > > that targets FPGAs. LiteSDCard is a small footprint, configurable
> > > > SDCard core commonly used in LiteX designs.
> > > >
> > > > The driver was first written in May 2020 and has been maintained
> > > > cooperatively by the LiteX community. Thanks to all contributors!
> > > >
> > > > Co-developed-by: Kamil Rakoczy <krakoczy@antmicro.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Kamil Rakoczy <krakoczy@antmicro.com>
> > > > Co-developed-by: Maciej Dudek <mdudek@internships.antmicro.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Maciej Dudek <mdudek@internships.antmicro.com>
> > > > Co-developed-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Somlo <gsomlo@gmail.com>
>
> > > > + host->clock = 0;
> > > > + cpu = of_get_next_cpu_node(NULL);
> > > > + ret = of_property_read_u32(cpu, "clock-frequency", &host->freq);
> > > > + of_node_put(cpu);
> > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No \"clock-frequency\" property in DT\n");
> > > > + goto err_free_host;
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > This looks fragile.
> > > Shouldn't the clock be obtained from a clock property in the mmc
> > > device node, pointing to a clock provider?
> > > How does the real clock tree look like?
> >
> > In a full LiteX SoC, the main sys_clock is used for cpu, buses, and as a
> > input source for peripherals such as LiteSDCard (which then further
> > subdivides it to obtain a 12.5--50.0 MHz sd_clock.
> >
> > But since we're considering supporting LiteSDCard as an independent IP
> > block, the "source clock" frequency should indeed be specified as a DT
> > property in the MMC device node. (I'll have to add that to the list of
> > updates for litex_json2dts_linux.py as well, once we settle on what it
> > will look like -- I'll try to make the change and corresponding update
> > to the devicetree bindings doc for v3).
> >
> > LMK what you think.
>
> Ideally there should be a "clocks" property with a phandle pointing to a
> clock controller node (compatible with "litex,clk").
>
> How does drivers/tty/serial/liteuart.c handle this? Oh, it doesn't ;-)
Assuming LiteX's `litex_json2dts_linux.py` is modified to include:
...
clocks {
sys_clk: litex_sys_clk {
#clock-cells = <0>;
compatible = "fixed-clock";
clock-frequency = <50000000>;
};
};
...
in the generated .dts (where `clock-frequency` is whatever the sys_clk
happens to be for that particular SoC gateware), we can then write the
mmc node like so:
soc {
...
mmc0: mmc@12005000 {
compatible = "litex,mmc";
reg = <0x12005000 0x100>,
<0x12003800 0x100>,
<0x12003000 0x100>,
<0x12004800 0x100>,
<0x12004000 0x100>;
reg-names = "phy", "core", "reader", "writer", "irq";
clocks = <&sys_clk>;
interrupt-parent = <&L1>;
interrupts = <4>;
};
...
};
The LiteSDCard clock initialization can then look like this:
...
/* initialize clock source */
clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(clk);
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't get clock: %d\n", ret);
goto err;
}
host->freq = clk_get_rate(clk); /* source (sys_clock) frequency */
host->clock = 0; /* calculated sdclock frequency */
...
As discussed before, I'll post a `litex_json2dts_linux.py` patch once
we've settled on a mutually agreeable solution, but I think this might
be it. If you agree, I'll also update the DT binding document to
require `clocks` as part of the mmc node.
I tested this in my v3 candidate, and it seems to be working OK.
LMK what you think, and/or if you have any suggestions for additional
improvements.
Thanks again,
--Gabriel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-07 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-04 20:41 [PATCH v2 0/3] mmc: Add LiteSDCard mmc driver Gabriel Somlo
2021-12-04 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] MAINTAINERS: co-maintain LiteX platform Gabriel Somlo
2021-12-06 23:59 ` Joel Stanley
2021-12-07 22:11 ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2021-12-04 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: mmc: Add bindings for LiteSDCard Gabriel Somlo
2021-12-06 9:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-12-06 10:18 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-12-06 15:36 ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2021-12-06 15:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-12-04 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mmc: Add driver for LiteX's LiteSDCard interface Gabriel Somlo
2021-12-04 20:57 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-12-05 1:37 ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2021-12-06 10:07 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-12-06 18:40 ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2021-12-08 20:14 ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2021-12-09 8:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-12-09 20:58 ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2021-12-10 8:04 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-12-06 12:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-12-07 14:10 ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2021-12-07 14:16 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-12-07 21:30 ` Gabriel L. Somlo [this message]
2021-12-08 9:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ya/SbwzYUD3gwwOL@errol.ini.cmu.edu \
--to=gsomlo@gmail.com \
--cc=david.abdurachmanov@sifive.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=florent@enjoy-digital.fr \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=kgugala@antmicro.com \
--cc=krakoczy@antmicro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mdudek@internships.antmicro.com \
--cc=mholenko@antmicro.com \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=shorne@gmail.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).