From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A13C433F5 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 20:41:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234688AbhLNUlO (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 15:41:14 -0500 Received: from mail-oo1-f49.google.com ([209.85.161.49]:43833 "EHLO mail-oo1-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230358AbhLNUlO (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 15:41:14 -0500 Received: by mail-oo1-f49.google.com with SMTP id w5-20020a4a2745000000b002c2649b8d5fso5245340oow.10 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:41:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=SXVVYVyXk3jQO/Z4zUyE4AbN0Wt7xmI613y4WmWTvv8=; b=RMJiCd5p43VgWoRCPRIG6eukhf8wxzlEdV8Ox5o6mEfKee51lkffz0RcSj/eh/2Cq/ 0ad7CaAZYtk8HORrBDTYYBYtvIFGfeETRf11llic2eHXpqibsQ7x6Zz+oBU6ai+QxdPN EBCTURtMdQqopqt091RfSRCsGKIOiJnqEtXnhBZrO5cX4ezdlcrBHspESU8A17JFQLoG m3w87jklVM8ipZvoThVQ2cavwQpeU4e5c2ZI76Vho50TE+YDIlmxdvLAaCOptkl9nm0v cd6UXXZJIHbJr4sslf/+/r1K/V2MvtIYm+GJ8YP/dvuuyOLEAJIAaJu1c8gfFGQz0xCZ +yeg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5323UvClb4Yme47uxwoCtEu0r4AI8yLwzkRRrpvLoWKQSV+Kz97P J7be1tW4lOUjbU0JNO5Cn3LV7ofMxg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzb+l9ufBYftWddcmRqXG0Rc70ptXTscOiNg4+d52emF6xt0n1yBSLP2lNNRMy58AagKGQkIg== X-Received: by 2002:a4a:430b:: with SMTP id k11mr795017ooj.69.1639514473603; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:41:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from robh.at.kernel.org (66-90-148-213.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [66.90.148.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p6sm196984oof.0.2021.12.14.12.41.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:41:12 -0800 (PST) Received: (nullmailer pid 3916246 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 20:41:11 -0000 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:41:11 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Robin Murphy Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, will@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com, mark.rutland@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] dt-bindings: perf: Add compatible for Arm DSU-110 Message-ID: References: <51a8060493e1220886dcd468fad9a2b603607297.1639490264.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51a8060493e1220886dcd468fad9a2b603607297.1639490264.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:16:17 +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > DSU-110 is the newest and shiniest for Armv9. Its programmer's model is > largely identical to the previous generation of DSUs, so we can treat it > as compatible, but it does have a a handful of extra IMP-DEF PMU events > to call its own. Thanks to the new notion of core complexes, the maximum > number of supported CPUs goes up as well. > > Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy > --- > > v2: Also make it complete and valid > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/perf/arm,dsu-pmu.yaml | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > Applied, thanks!