devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: David Collins <quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <quic_subbaram@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: define support for name based regulators
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 19:32:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfREsxeSSX2pbALf@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fcd130891cc1d52cb09b8bfc866ab7ef1ce3b2a1.1643069954.git.quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 755 bytes --]

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 04:27:35PM -0800, David Collins wrote:

> Name based SCMI regulator specification helps ensure that an SCMI
> agent doesn't need to be aware of the numbering scheme used for

What is a "SCMI agent" in this context?  This is changing how the DT
bindings are specified, at some point things are going to need to be
hard coded.

> +              regulator-name: true
> +
> +            anyOf:
> +              - required:
> +                  - reg
> +              - required:
> +                  - regulator-name

This is abusing the existing regulator-name property which is there to
allow a human readable descriptive string to be attached to a regulator.
It should have no effect other than being included in diagnostic output.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-28 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-25  0:27 [RESEND PATCH 0/2] regulator: scmi: add support for registering SCMI regulators by name David Collins
2022-01-25  0:27 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: define support for name based regulators David Collins
2022-01-28 19:32   ` Mark Brown [this message]
2022-01-28 23:09     ` David Collins
2022-02-02 17:38       ` Mark Brown
2022-02-03  0:09         ` David Collins
2022-02-03 11:28           ` Mark Brown
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-12-10  1:54 [PATCH 0/2] regulator: scmi: add support for registering SCMI regulators by name David Collins
2021-12-10  1:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: define support for name based regulators David Collins
2022-01-24 23:20   ` [RESEND PATCH " David Collins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YfREsxeSSX2pbALf@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_collinsd@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_subbaram@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).