devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
	aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, wefu@redhat.com, liush@allwinnertech.com,
	guoren@kernel.org, atishp@atishpatra.org, anup@brainfault.org,
	drew@beagleboard.org, hch@lst.de, arnd@arndb.de, wens@csie.org,
	maxime@cerno.tech, gfavor@ventanamicro.com,
	andrea.mondelli@huawei.com, behrensj@mit.edu,
	xinhaoqu@huawei.com, huffman@cadence.com, mick@ics.forth.gr,
	allen.baum@esperantotech.com, jscheid@ventanamicro.com,
	rtrauben@gmail.com, samuel@sholland.org, cmuellner@linux.com,
	philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] riscv: support for Svpbmt and D1 memory types
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 01:49:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgP+n5OMhQPSbICV@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220209123800.269774-1-heiko@sntech.de>

On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 01:37:46PM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Svpbmt is an extension defining "Supervisor-mode: page-based memory types"
> for things like non-cacheable pages or I/O memory pages.
> 
> 
> So this is my 2nd try at implementing Svpbmt (and the diverging D1 memory
> types) using the alternatives framework.
> 
> This includes a number of changes to the alternatives mechanism itself.
> The biggest one being the move to a more central location, as I expect
> in the future, nearly every chip needing some sort of patching, be it
> either for erratas or for optional features (svpbmt or others).
> 
> The dt-binding for svpbmt itself is of course not finished and is still
> using the binding introduced in previous versions, as where to put
> a svpbmt-property in the devicetree is still under dicussion.
> Atish seems to be working on a framework for extensions [0],
> 
> The series also introduces support for the memory types of the D1
> which are implemented differently to svpbmt. But when patching anyway
> it's pretty clean to add the D1 variant via ALTERNATIVE_2 to the same
> location.
> 
> The only slightly bigger difference is that the "normal" type is not 0
> as with svpbmt, so kernel patches for this PMA type need to be applied
> even before the MMU is brought up, so the series introduces a separate
> stage for that.
> 
> 
> In theory this series is 3 parts:
> - sbi cache-flush / null-ptr
> - alternatives improvements
> - svpbmt+d1
> 
> So expecially patches from the first 2 areas could be applied when
> deemed ready, I just thought to keep it together to show-case where
> the end-goal is and not requiring jumping between different series.
> 
> 
> The sbi cache-flush patch is based on Atish's sparse-hartid patch [1],
> as it touches a similar area in mm/cacheflush.c
> 
> 
> I picked the recipient list from the previous version, hopefully
> I didn't forget anybody.
> 
> changes in v6:
> - rebase onto 5.17-rc1
> - handle sbi null-ptr differently
> - improve commit messages
> - use riscv,mmu as property name
> 
> changes in v5:
> - move to use alternatives for runtime-patching

Hi,

another choice is using static key mechanism. Pros: no need to coding
in asm, all in c.

To support new arch features, I see other arch sometimes use static
key, sometimes use alternative mechanism, so one question here would
be which mechanism is better? Any guide?

Thanks in advance

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-09 17:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-09 12:37 [PATCH v6 00/14] riscv: support for Svpbmt and D1 memory types Heiko Stuebner
2022-02-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v6 01/14] riscv: prevent null-pointer dereference with sbi_remote_fence_i Heiko Stuebner
2022-02-11  1:59   ` Atish Patra
2022-02-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v6 02/14] riscv: integrate alternatives better into the main architecture Heiko Stuebner
2022-02-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v6 03/14] riscv: allow different stages with alternatives Heiko Stuebner
2022-02-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v6 04/14] riscv: implement module alternatives Heiko Stuebner
2022-02-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v6 05/14] riscv: implement ALTERNATIVE_2 macro Heiko Stuebner
2022-02-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v6 06/14] riscv: extend concatenated alternatives-lines to the same length Heiko Stuebner
2022-02-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v6 07/14] riscv: prevent compressed instructions in alternatives Heiko Stuebner
2022-03-08  0:47   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-02-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v6 08/14] riscv: move boot alternatives to a slightly earlier position Heiko Stuebner
2022-02-10 22:42   ` Atish Patra
2022-02-11  1:11     ` Heiko Stübner
2022-02-11  1:57       ` Atish Patra
2022-02-11  9:34         ` Heiko Stübner
2022-03-08  0:47   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-03-23 16:51     ` Heiko Stübner
2022-02-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v6 09/14] riscv: Fix accessing pfn bits in PTEs for non-32bit variants Heiko Stuebner
2022-02-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v6 10/14] riscv: add cpufeature handling via alternatives Heiko Stuebner
2022-02-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v6 11/14] dt-bindings: riscv: add MMU Standard Extensions support for Svpbmt Heiko Stuebner
2022-02-09 18:47   ` Rob Herring
2022-02-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v6 12/14] riscv: add RISC-V Svpbmt extension support Heiko Stuebner
2022-02-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v6 13/14] riscv: remove FIXMAP_PAGE_IO and fall back to its default value Heiko Stuebner
2022-02-09 12:38 ` [PATCH v6 14/14] riscv: add memory-type errata for T-Head Heiko Stuebner
2022-02-11  0:12   ` Atish Patra
2022-02-11  9:25     ` Heiko Stübner
2022-02-12  0:27       ` Atish Patra
2022-02-11  2:01   ` Atish Patra
2022-02-14  3:42   ` Samuel Holland
2022-02-09 17:49 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2022-02-09 23:44   ` [PATCH v6 00/14] riscv: support for Svpbmt and D1 memory types Heiko Stübner
2022-02-10 16:01     ` Jisheng Zhang
2022-02-11  0:25 ` Atish Patra
2022-02-11  1:48   ` Atish Patra
2022-02-11  2:04     ` Heiko Stübner
2022-02-12  0:25       ` Atish Patra
2022-02-14 20:02         ` Heiko Stübner
2022-02-14 20:25           ` Atish Patra
2022-02-14 20:37             ` Heiko Stübner
2022-03-09  7:56 ` Guo Ren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YgP+n5OMhQPSbICV@xhacker \
    --to=jszhang@kernel.org \
    --cc=allen.baum@esperantotech.com \
    --cc=andrea.mondelli@huawei.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
    --cc=behrensj@mit.edu \
    --cc=cmuellner@linux.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=drew@beagleboard.org \
    --cc=gfavor@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=huffman@cadence.com \
    --cc=jscheid@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=liush@allwinnertech.com \
    --cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=mick@ics.forth.gr \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rtrauben@gmail.com \
    --cc=samuel@sholland.org \
    --cc=wefu@redhat.com \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    --cc=xinhaoqu@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).