From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F07EC433EF for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1351766AbiBKQzo (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:55:44 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:54474 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233971AbiBKQzn (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:55:43 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f173.google.com (mail-qk1-f173.google.com [209.85.222.173]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7866221F; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:55:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk1-f173.google.com with SMTP id g145so8798477qke.3; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:55:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=1UwYLCupktfjJ9mUj4/QYlTAZwDMfe5S5C3K0edWIBg=; b=fUdBWbNdCXx8ojtAcgxNl4vXqIy2Os4aHxTwHDyP7r1/U05DTpOubeknxWtZjuOHci UKoaxKwhX8MsrPNibB23ztkNWl2V40PdYb74ozlwtZqR4OBDTb4kISePmdQwijuW35lR 9dXo/JXi5rV7xaZ+YQpxZQ2AKdDA9dSEby3CF8epRhn2Eu4tL1RNSuS92+zk1BON5m4t 3OF2c3mpOGmO+leBQrwTHGd1OYkMVzpsoRmDZgiLN0b3RPl+22OBefNOdV7kYMHRLDNT /lIERsbOqSJQN5u7sTeV1Kv45M33pf4nLbokjDl8Qri1xfxhxfRsZ8sBBYqd15w7AiCY n1SQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530UaDFAwYsv0O7YPfNNcauHx1q/2LXUYaKNyrD//UtN57fMYOY9 KF8xibbKcshahNBufJ8vcjWLg0NOQg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzWhtYP/lUed83bNEhXzwT/Rs7Lt75nHeV6b3tF2GWmTTD5Cck+mTKwvTJDx3LpaD35b0Op9A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:d45:: with SMTP id o5mr1221552qkl.731.1644598541587; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:55:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from robh.at.kernel.org ([2607:fb90:5fee:dfce:b6df:c3e1:b1e5:d6d8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bk19sm11503188qkb.125.2022.02.11.08.55.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:55:40 -0800 (PST) Received: (nullmailer pid 512729 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:55:38 -0000 Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 10:55:38 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Leilk Liu Cc: Mark Brown , Matthias Brugger , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: spi: Add compatible for Mediatek IPM IP with single mode Message-ID: References: <20220209111938.16137-1-leilk.liu@mediatek.com> <20220209111938.16137-2-leilk.liu@mediatek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220209111938.16137-2-leilk.liu@mediatek.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 07:19:33PM +0800, Leilk Liu wrote: > This commit adds dt-binding documentation for > Mediatek SPI IPM IP with single mode. > > Signed-off-by: Leilk Liu > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mt65xx.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mt65xx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mt65xx.yaml > index bfa44acb1bdd..0a2fc0404cb3 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mt65xx.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mt65xx.yaml > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ properties: > - mediatek,mt8135-spi > - mediatek,mt8173-spi > - mediatek,mt8183-spi > + - mediatek,ipm-spi-single Is IPM an SoC? Compatible strings should be SoC specific or whatever granularity could have a unique errata. Rob