From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
"linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@renesas.com>,
Biju Das <biju.das@bp.renesas.com>,
Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] media: dt-bindings: media: renesas,vsp1: Document RZ/{G2L,V2L} VSPD bindings
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 14:13:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yi8xcuxSff0UFRaf@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdVYYMJvbnR3r-KGtU=3hiKjsiaXH4xyUzhv7vY5Y6MB6A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Geert,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 10:01:14AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 9:44 AM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 08:42:03AM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> > > > Document VSPD found in RZ/G2L and RZ/V2L family SoC's. VSPD block is
> > > > similar to VSP2-D found on R-Car SoC's, but it does not have a version
> > > > register and it has 3 clocks compared to 1 clock on vsp1 and vsp2.
> > > >
> > > > This patch introduces a new compatible 'renesas,rzg2l-vsp2' to handle
> > > > these differences.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
>
> > > > index 990e9c1dbc43..2696a4582251 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,vsp1.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,vsp1.yaml
>
> > > > + clock-names:
> > > > + items:
> > > > + - const: du.0
> > >
> > > Similarly, I'm not sure this is a good name from the point of view of the
> > > VSP.
> >
> > OK, will use the name 'aclk', which is Main clock for this module which is
> > shared with LCDC. 'du.0' is not valid any more here as we are using different
> > CRTC implementation for RZ/G2LC.
> >
> > > > + - const: pclk
> > > > + - const: vclk
> > >
> > > I couldn't find those names in the documentation, where do they come from
> >
> > HW manual (page 312) mentions about LCDC_CLK_A, LCDC_CLK_P & LCDC_CLK_D.
> >
> > Detailed description is mentioned in Clock list document. Please see below.
> >
> > LCDC_CLK_A M0φ PLL3 200 200 LCDC Main clock
> > LCDC_CLK_P ZTφ PLL3 100 100 LCDC Register Access Clock
> > LCDC_CLK_D M3φ SEL_PLL5_4 148.5~5.803 LCDC Video Clock
> >
> > > ? Could you maybe share a DT integration example ?
> >
> > Please see below,
>
> >
> > + du: display@0x10890000 {
> > + compatible = "renesas,du-r9a07g044l";
> > + reg = <0 0x10890000 0 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 152 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD R9A07G044_LCDC_CLK_A>,
> > + <&cpg CPG_MOD R9A07G044_LCDC_CLK_P>,
> > + <&cpg CPG_MOD R9A07G044_LCDC_CLK_D>;
> > + clock-names = "du.0", "pclk", "vclk";
> > + power-domains = <&cpg>;
> > + resets = <&cpg R9A07G044_LCDC_RESET_N>;
> > + reset-names = "du.0";
> > + renesas,vsps = <&vspd0 0>;
>
> Given the DU driver is no longer shared, perhaps all occurrencies of "du"
> should be replaced by "lcdc"?
The LCDC is the combination of the FCPVD, the VSPD and the DU. The first
two are similar to the eponymous IP cores used on R-Car Gen3, while the
DU is a different beast, despite sharing the same name.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-14 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220312084205.31462-1-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
2022-03-12 8:42 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] media: dt-bindings: media: renesas,vsp1: Document RZ/{G2L,V2L} VSPD bindings Biju Das
2022-03-13 14:19 ` Laurent Pinchart
2022-03-14 8:44 ` Biju Das
2022-03-14 9:01 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-03-14 11:56 ` Biju Das
2022-03-14 12:13 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2022-03-14 12:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yi8xcuxSff0UFRaf@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=Chris.Paterson2@renesas.com \
--cc=biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=biju.das@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox