From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: msm: dsi: remove address/size cells
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 12:01:52 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YkKmPSesQfS6RLCD@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_Jsq+6rx0UU6ryH+z_8KLQqKKuhTCnh=Oft2F03bcze+EV0Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 28-03-22, 13:21, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 12:18 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 28/03/2022 19:16, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > On 28-03-22, 19:43, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 at 18:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > >> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> The DSI node is not a bus and the children do not have unit addresses.
> > >>>
> > >>> Reported-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> > >>
> > >> NAK.
> > >> DSI panels are children of the DSI device tree node with the reg = <0>; address.
> > >> This is the convention used by other platforms too (see e.g.
> > >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq-evk.dts).
> > >
> > > So we should add reg = 0, i will update my dtsi fix
> > >
> >
> > To "ports" node? No. The reg=0 is for children of the bus, so the
> > panels. How to combine both without warnings - ports and panel@0 - I
> > don't know yet...
>
> I don't think that should case a warning. Or at least it's one we turn off.
Well in this case I think we might need a fix:
Here is the example quoted in the binding. We have ports{} and then the
two port@0 and port@1 underneath.
So it should be okay to drop #address-cells/#size-cells from dsi node
but keep in ports node...
Thoughts...?
dsi@ae94000 {
compatible = "qcom,mdss-dsi-ctrl";
reg = <0x0ae94000 0x400>;
reg-names = "dsi_ctrl";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
interrupt-parent = <&mdss>;
interrupts = <4>;
clocks = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_BYTE0_CLK>,
<&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_BYTE0_INTF_CLK>,
<&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_PCLK0_CLK>,
<&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_ESC0_CLK>,
<&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_AHB_CLK>,
<&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_AXI_CLK>;
clock-names = "byte",
"byte_intf",
"pixel",
"core",
"iface",
"bus";
phys = <&dsi0_phy>;
phy-names = "dsi";
assigned-clocks = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_BYTE0_CLK_SRC>, <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_PCLK0_CLK_SRC>;
assigned-clock-parents = <&dsi_phy 0>, <&dsi_phy 1>;
power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7180_CX>;
operating-points-v2 = <&dsi_opp_table>;
ports {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
port@0 {
reg = <0>;
dsi0_in: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&dpu_intf1_out>;
};
};
port@1 {
reg = <1>;
dsi0_out: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&sn65dsi86_in>;
data-lanes = <0 1 2 3>;
};
};
};
};
>
> Rob
--
~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-29 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-28 15:29 [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: msm: dsi: remove address/size cells Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-03-28 15:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-03-28 16:43 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-03-28 17:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-03-28 17:16 ` Vinod Koul
2022-03-28 17:17 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-03-28 18:21 ` Rob Herring
2022-03-29 6:31 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2022-03-29 15:52 ` Rob Herring
2022-03-31 6:05 ` Vinod Koul
2022-03-31 9:34 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-03-31 15:51 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YkKmPSesQfS6RLCD@matsya \
--to=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox