From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <devicetree-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9788ECCA473
	for <linux-devicetree@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 21:09:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S237349AbiF3VJL (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-devicetree@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 30 Jun 2022 17:09:11 -0400
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60528 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S236849AbiF3VJL (ORCPT
        <rfc822;devicetree@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 30 Jun 2022 17:09:11 -0400
Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [185.16.172.187])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E13911F2E8;
        Thu, 30 Jun 2022 14:09:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch;
        s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version:
        References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:
        Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
        Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References;
        bh=jYiwArxJOPIMKTn3ckicwMJjp+sAHT0Bcl9xbjqkMYA=; b=wNn8I5D1TAgaOQx931cxYaKLD/
        s+nyAYCMj58qPvKH2z879Vw3j7rwFWiRe14OJ80h5uUpyi3PrbuUNlAL6ApAa3FC9GWnT3EA4VNvR
        C4h+kldixbWRsvQFRcg8B18CdVNVl9WB9YB2wZtg9AZFr8mfhTvd3cVR5Ooh2kjv7IzI=;
Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2)
        (envelope-from <andrew@lunn.ch>)
        id 1o71Oq-008r5z-Tg; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 23:08:32 +0200
Date:   Thu, 30 Jun 2022 23:08:32 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: lan966x: hardcode port count
Message-ID: <Yr4Q0G4w9waIx7Ux@lunn.ch>
References: <20220630140237.692986-1-michael@walle.cc>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220630140237.692986-1-michael@walle.cc>
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <devicetree.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 04:02:33PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> Don't rely on the device tree to count the number of physical port. Instead
> introduce a new compatible string which the driver can use to select the
> correct port count.

Does the silicon have an ID register which identifies what the device
is?

	Andrew