From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B249AC54EE9 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2022 01:03:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229487AbiIDBDW (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Sep 2022 21:03:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40934 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229478AbiIDBDV (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Sep 2022 21:03:21 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [185.16.172.187]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C98D4F67F; Sat, 3 Sep 2022 18:03:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=ATZI2fowS/AxNbsIyQzG4QYaMmr60ObaKExsdpSgzzM=; b=ZG5uY2CawXp8WZ17SgfqwPmxnT DwbUmf6KngHXLwGvOHgfAD6NRtTRCXgElbWKF1PL/km3GaOQLvahBGD9kYBI7ar8JY4pEppA/S50K C4RlWab0Lb5CtCJ286X64mS1bqK+gi4VRc/N6jllxtM80TV7cozuzG3HxLcmwoX5/cps=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1oUe2K-00FXdb-PA; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 03:02:56 +0200 Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2022 03:02:56 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= Cc: Gregory Clement , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Marek Behun , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: turris-omnia: Add mcu node Message-ID: References: <20220819131152.6513-1-pali@kernel.org> <20220831142809.lcmnv3l4rnulo522@pali> <20220903152735.2ga3iwrivh6zhibf@pali> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220903152735.2ga3iwrivh6zhibf@pali> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > > I'm also not sure what the DT people will say about the node name mcu. > > I don't see any examples of that in the binding documentation. They > > might request you rename it to gpio-controller, unless it does more > > than GPIO? And if it does do more than GPIO we are then into mfd > > territory, and the binding then becomes much more interesting. Then we > > start the questions, are you defining a ABI now, before there is even > > a driver for it? > > > > Andrew > > Yes, there is already driver. See my previous email, I mentioned it and > also I wrote link for this driver. Moreover now driver is merged in > upstream u-boot. I'm not comfortable accepting a DT binding for a driver which does not exist in Linux. As i said, there are interesting ABI issues here, and it could be the MFD, GPIO or reset Maintainers don't accept a binding until a Linux driver exists. At minimum, you need an Acked-by from the GPIO Maintainer, of the binding before this DT change is merged via MVEBU. Andrew