From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E59F225A357; Wed, 9 Apr 2025 08:51:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744188684; cv=none; b=kmIjrel3Pxuw6BuoA2CksKEurR6sOnEckIPZtk50TyjqU2cf8Vm3cqA+5udC2jrhksc2QhqAa/cWxNuIp4otBYhn0yY0R4vsSd9yVNAiZKNm5np1oqed93FVvAXa1djwFkxRiyQpcHl/lQS2SvuGl+Sfa3ObeKqmLMeWUrbLyBM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744188684; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AL5W+KRUqaJomjLaLeEEJHtcXw0BSUHBCWmlwEEAeeU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=MKClCRGGcBRWdDzMX5miGnk2Sj6i0yhQfevkCCVc9H8YVNyeIptVmfUiiXjiPS0bE8BBB+jOKdw86CHUdvAVJ7/IjcGWMl9tPxNlWNpOjUtx7H8BWxcZ+vRgtX+Tm2DgM3d3NfEHnk3vXxuCsfvPqI6sLnYiRfeG+RWPgQru5mM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=uJXY6lsz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="uJXY6lsz" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 735EEC4CEE3; Wed, 9 Apr 2025 08:51:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1744188683; bh=AL5W+KRUqaJomjLaLeEEJHtcXw0BSUHBCWmlwEEAeeU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=uJXY6lsz5OMOeMj5aFUOGvH4/cXFTMy98fHqjKBXPn6omJo8XPcSMFbVhpzjfvhzW ymV7kkvFMyDUReKBV81qFzDN95WZlmJbWrj3ycxUOGkLovmm25el8igW9gbjIUfOQE fv91KZN1oP4bdxPED3xp+DXE/KsEYaSc05uekioxLanU2Xq+8B/DP8l0pKs6ucQtPB OgxmudNHQgpt23WESrBzQcOvtRiHeu29qTjLmr8aQ+USyLnc+cKTpOyKW04KAeuOIB rUlHWKByGkltuVevmK7ewCXZkoWs3y3k9QkjnmNaY0icuCJNsKe0Lm5ZHMH2AqDiep jZiGSMYKyAGfA== Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 10:51:16 +0200 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Marc Zyngier , Thomas Gleixner , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Sascha Bischoff , Timothy Hayes , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/24] arm64/sysreg: Add ICH_HFGWTR_EL2 Message-ID: References: <20250408-gicv5-host-v1-0-1f26db465f8d@kernel.org> <20250408-gicv5-host-v1-13-1f26db465f8d@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 09:48:49AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2025, at 12:50, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > Add ICH_HFGWTR_EL2 register description to sysreg. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi > > Cc: Will Deacon > > Cc: Catalin Marinas > > Cc: Marc Zyngier > > No comment on the contents, but I feel that having ten patches > adding new sysregs one group at a time is a bit worse than a > single patch adding them all. The patch descriptions don't add > any particular information about why these are distinct, and you > need them all anyway, so I'd suggest combining them into a > larger patch. I posted them separately to simplify "reviewing" their content, I will do whatever is preferred. Thanks, Lorenzo