From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] i2c: core: Follow i2c-parent when retrieving an adapter from node
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:03:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-5O3-FSsHbn27lW@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250205173918.600037-2-herve.codina@bootlin.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3116 bytes --]
> Extend i2c_find_adapter_by_fwnode() to perform the walking from the
> given fwnode through i2c-parent references up to the adapter.
Even with the review of the schema going on, here are some comments
already.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> index 5546184df05f..cb7adc5c1285 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> @@ -1827,14 +1827,55 @@ static int i2c_dev_or_parent_fwnode_match(struct device *dev, const void *data)
> */
> struct i2c_adapter *i2c_find_adapter_by_fwnode(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> {
> + struct fwnode_reference_args args;
> + struct fwnode_handle *adap_fwnode;
> struct i2c_adapter *adapter;
> struct device *dev;
> + int err;
>
> if (!fwnode)
> return NULL;
>
> - dev = bus_find_device(&i2c_bus_type, NULL, fwnode,
> + adap_fwnode = fwnode_handle_get(fwnode);
> +
> + /* Walk extension busses (through i2c-parent) up to the adapter node */
> + while (fwnode_property_present(adap_fwnode, "i2c-parent")) {
> + /*
> + * A specific case exists for the i2c demux pinctrl. The i2c bus
> + * node related this component (the i2c demux pinctrl node
> + * itself) has an i2c-parent property set. This property is used
> + * by the i2c demux pinctrl component for the demuxing purpose
> + * and is not related to the extension bus feature.
> + *
> + * In this current i2c-parent walking, the i2c demux pinctrl
> + * node has to be considered as an adapter node and so, if
> + * the adap_fwnode node is an i2c demux pinctrl node, simply
> + * stop the i2c-parent walking.
> + */
> + if (fwnode_property_match_string(adap_fwnode, "compatible",
> + "i2c-demux-pinctrl") >= 0)
> + break;
I understand the unlikeliness of another demux driver showing up, yet
relying on compatible-values here is too easy to get stale. What about
checking if the i2c-parent property has more than one entry? That should
be only true for demuxers.
> +
> + /*
> + * i2c-parent property available in a i2c bus node means that
> + * this node is an extension bus node. In that case,
> + * continue i2c-parent walking up to the adapter node.
> + */
> + err = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(adap_fwnode, "i2c-parent",
> + NULL, 0, 0, &args);
> + if (err)
> + break;
> +
> + pr_debug("Find adapter for %pfw, use parent: %pfw\n", fwnode,
> + args.fwnode);
Is this useful when creating the overlays? I tend to ask you to remove
it one RFC phase is over. If it is useful, it should be at least
dev_dbg?
> +
> + fwnode_handle_put(adap_fwnode);
> + adap_fwnode = args.fwnode;
> + }
> +
> + dev = bus_find_device(&i2c_bus_type, NULL, adap_fwnode,
> i2c_dev_or_parent_fwnode_match);
> + fwnode_handle_put(adap_fwnode);
> if (!dev)
> return NULL;
>
> --
> 2.47.1
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-03 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-05 17:39 [RFC PATCH 0/3] i2c: Introduce i2c bus extensions Herve Codina
2025-02-05 17:39 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] i2c: core: Follow i2c-parent when retrieving an adapter from node Herve Codina
2025-04-03 9:03 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2025-04-03 10:50 ` Herve Codina
2025-04-03 11:20 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-03 12:21 ` Herve Codina
2025-02-05 17:39 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] i2c: i2c-core-of: Move children registration in a dedicated function Herve Codina
2025-04-03 9:07 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-03 10:51 ` Herve Codina
2025-02-05 17:39 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] i2c: i2c-core-of: Handle i2c bus extensions Herve Codina
2025-02-12 5:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-12 9:45 ` Herve Codina
2025-04-03 9:09 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-02-19 13:38 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] i2c: Introduce " Herve Codina
2025-03-20 12:49 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-03-20 16:31 ` Luca Ceresoli
2025-03-20 21:37 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-03 9:15 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-06-12 7:52 ` Ayush Singh
2025-06-13 7:30 ` Herve Codina
2025-07-03 11:26 ` Ayush Singh
2025-07-03 15:19 ` Herve Codina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z-5O3-FSsHbn27lW@shikoro \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).