On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 04:28:22PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/04/2025 12:31, Marcus Folkesson wrote:
> >>> +    i2c {
> >>> +        #address-cells = <1>;
> >>> +        #size-cells = <0>;
> >>> +
> >>> +        display@3f {
> >>
> >> Look how this is called in other bindings... The binding and example are
> >> not following existing code. Why? Why doing something entirely
> >> different?
> > 
> > Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean here.
> You added code entirely different than existing code. Why doing
> something entirely different? Open any other panel and look how it is
> called.

This is still unclear to me.

I assume you are referring to the display@3f?
I can see many other panels use display@<address>, e.g.
elgin,jg10309-01.yaml
and 
sitronix,st7735r.yaml

Those are using address 0, but that is because they are SPI devices,
this is a I2C device and address 0 is not valid. 
There are plenty of examples of I2C devices using the real addresses in the
node name.

Or do you want me to call it panel@3f ?
I can go with that if it is preferred.

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Best regards,
Marcus Folkesson