From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AADA217F50; Thu, 5 Dec 2024 14:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733408849; cv=none; b=Nmu3CtI2Dz6M4Z3prFD34/joONDHdO6gDB6acPKPnK0ZC0ZYluQyKq5gdVLqo4MJjCqOmumEudCqFOiTc8W/mcXs4msaWm6IAXpNq7DLUY9PupUGuKelCuBBssV7ALvFo1LdywoqTq+fixmTWjwNEmGD9Mp9pVgQNwc0G0TTdUk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733408849; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6jvY1TGlZAQLgaOJ/U1KDMJOJn103xAHj0ddui9cQNQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=SlP2vT+AXoM3G0SSbFGeLn+H8aeVgSJRBI1//nH+TKvcyBG46wSSwvHyt67G+1XdwKUkiXWzIaBmActB0AZpeBvEBMOalXxjq99uJm8rwFicQ+k6nBEbHPaDdcdH+MvtCnmyreHGo4qguAcQ3wO61NEVfELhkmru5oZyC1SXC4Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A45661063; Thu, 5 Dec 2024 06:27:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from bogus (e133711.arm.com [10.1.196.55]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 659BF3F5A1; Thu, 5 Dec 2024 06:27:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 14:27:24 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Liviu Dudau Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla , "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: fvp: Update bus-range property Message-ID: References: <20241128152543.1821878-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> <173339457335.691023.1334271427632194234.b4-ty@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 01:57:20PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 10:31:03AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 20:55:43 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote: > > > These days, the Fixed Virtual Platforms(FVP) Base RevC model supports > > > more PCI devices. Update the max bus number so that Linux can enumerate > > > them correctly. Without this, the kernel throws the below error while > > > booting with the default hierarchy > > > > > > pci_bus 0000:01: busn_res: [bus 01] end is updated to 01 > > > pci_bus 0000:02: busn_res: can not insert [bus 02-01] under [bus 00-01] (conflicts with (null) [bus 00-01]) > > > pci_bus 0000:02: busn_res: [bus 02-01] end is updated to 02 > > > pci_bus 0000:02: busn_res: can not insert [bus 02] under [bus 00-01] (conflicts with (null) [bus 00-01]) > > > pci_bus 0000:03: busn_res: can not insert [bus 03-01] under [bus 00-01] (conflicts with (null) [bus 00-01]) > > > pci_bus 0000:03: busn_res: [bus 03-01] end is updated to 03 > > > pci_bus 0000:03: busn_res: can not insert [bus 03] under [bus 00-01] (conflicts with (null) [bus 00-01]) > > > pci_bus 0000:04: busn_res: can not insert [bus 04-01] under [bus 00-01] (conflicts with (null) [bus 00-01]) > > > pci_bus 0000:04: busn_res: [bus 04-01] end is updated to 04 > > > pci_bus 0000:04: busn_res: can not insert [bus 04] under [bus 00-01] (conflicts with (null) [bus 00-01]) > > > pci 0000:00:01.0: BAR 14: assigned [mem 0x50000000-0x500fffff] > > > > > > [...] > > > > Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (for-next/juno/fixes), thanks! > > > > [1/1] arm64: dts: fvp: Update bus-range property > > https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/4f776d81bf92 > > Thanks for the quick response. TBH, I did not receive your initial review > email, that's why I've messaged thinking it got lost. No I hadn't responded on the list yet. I queue and wait for a day for the kbuild bot or any other bots to report no failures before I officially respond as applied as I wouldn't have tried all build configs in general but it doesn't apply for DT files though 😉. -- Regards, Sudeep