From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.8bytes.org (mail.8bytes.org [85.214.250.239]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C7012E4A; Mon, 6 Jan 2025 11:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=85.214.250.239 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736163411; cv=none; b=mktBovl+dy1v0wTwgV7VKAowa0DbYZkKzfx97yGMtXmJjVdTvAq6ml8pfKXlnAKtt0iXs03mEgAAKDrE0j6s4cfVZOUcnFq9UDV/zfmYoT2LiSRApxTepIT5Efii2ruLHWeYFi4aUhYoYu5GgHioraWNMEnGHSXRj6ZYAuXC8RU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736163411; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YN58tjVz70PHm/pGFOJ+/GEdu/r7pxe7tJRI2ZBFXmU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=mZljMPZWVC4akJQ8UNfH2EjH3udcgdBqact3DVwru21a3D9G2MyLg6cmZGX6X4EXzrE4NxmpJcHQVqEJFGJx4se/KY1XdR/ZI/F3/i/jUnZbh3lUj/OG/uwiEvWivzfbeDHAmWU7aw1THmsXSiugQ01XrKc871jXWglidmmLAzg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=8bytes.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=8bytes.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=8bytes.org header.i=@8bytes.org header.b=O+eZgIxO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=85.214.250.239 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=8bytes.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=8bytes.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=8bytes.org header.i=@8bytes.org header.b="O+eZgIxO" Received: from 8bytes.org (p200300f6af348600d06e0009f19b6c7e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:f6:af34:8600:d06e:9:f19b:6c7e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.8bytes.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE4222E0016; Mon, 6 Jan 2025 12:36:46 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=8bytes.org; s=default; t=1736163406; bh=YN58tjVz70PHm/pGFOJ+/GEdu/r7pxe7tJRI2ZBFXmU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=O+eZgIxO/FoAd8/RTShOPk8F+f5IpkpVxsuPx4+tZ/b33HJTWqYVLLffeHEUgKAVp +QEWB32R5ziD8qV4vLWUSPxDPMg+qQ/S/9AzF2qFvf1QrCbkNHUYLVr33dTgPQc07N sOLK2KQtkDPiOv/ftv290QVXDlkRuo1Yg5rfNjFs6piSWshM5UNgx9GHc472Usn06f ZVBYORJ/SCcnS0xhJAyLXsQxLfwZwT2GeoQD9ba8uLNhOIvKMhGHmf6V4RBqfK07X7 4T4uaZ7osSNna3/vMPLs9C1OJTyPZhZX/giQJbTdP578ibDMzyCKSt8DlFS1NRt23t BMrVvluk5MxBQ== Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 12:36:45 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel To: Andy Yan Cc: heiko@sntech.de, krzk+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Andy Yan Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] dt-bindings: iommu: rockchip: Add Rockchip RK3576 Message-ID: References: <20241231093154.252595-1-andyshrk@163.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241231093154.252595-1-andyshrk@163.com> On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 05:31:50PM +0800, Andy Yan wrote: > From: Andy Yan > > Just like RK3588, RK3576 is compatible to the existing rk3568 > binding. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Yan > Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner > Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) Applied, thanks.