From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from baldur.buserror.net (baldur.buserror.net [165.227.176.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 689EB38DDB; Sun, 9 Feb 2025 20:50:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=165.227.176.147 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739134211; cv=none; b=pHtsp1/Onn2sPV/F8NjTtx7rQldj/4e0Y+x6xU6fZkOkxKbTlb9DLdbcAz4fEPd70g9rt7aIMw0Ttep6AriU9FfgRGLmsjAUOAaU7N8lPnWVkPcMVGNK+2D89ZqDWnsYcEpJUy/yMIHtXsUuSCops2X1jgMLXTrP2//ClV/12l0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739134211; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QhRwFeKqWMeHZQA5gyZTCQJnuWVF8Yk6P25dHCpDbWU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:Subject; b=gqJb6KOBT2WFLCDw9DzSxj0fpPd4Prp4W8iYP+kRbH3PkMV9WG+UIdJITM8N+RBZfMv3jSrRljc1wx+KXwqnBBt3GhFHxiDLzUEnyOY0MKkXtN8tLd2IKJugqwETVKpS8lxPjSggy+IM1pWEvIn7NX9O0U3d+CtW313crM+HeiI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=buserror.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=buserror.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=buserror.net header.i=@buserror.net header.b=JwerkDeF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=165.227.176.147 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=buserror.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=buserror.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=buserror.net header.i=@buserror.net header.b="JwerkDeF" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=buserror.net; s=rsa_sel; h=Subject:In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=MuELZahnfjB2zfNBXkn/7vS+YWEIHeJmEyTF3bHn8yY=; b=JwerkDeFpUYmUtvgiyfDWFRcyc M1SayaRB+qccNqxuZLeR/Bh0Zi4doXvs2AuwQ4bXULgliRwmuL+46mVeaEmUJnjt20xSeByKQCeF7 pqQnatSRU4+zfcORETcgPqMoDuz9Ijk4jbJsPiKiaLEQcbpIHWc/P0F4c/jFvX5d56ebaA3NJGjAd XSH27+KqmV7Z5IMLaNqwxgX15BzUCAKWCpbNvQyD4qc8VY5U6w9qaUHRzKdRGVNRg0Fih8GzX5jbP YQTGOo2FWDlTffHnVVvamHnt6obLmm/skiwsWgFKjykOnhriFwqciL6UJ9O4Wfc6dQ7QoO2ga6o7N QoWK9LuQ==; Received: from oss by baldur.buserror.net with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1thEFY-00C5fM-1y; Sun, 09 Feb 2025 14:49:57 -0600 Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2025 14:49:56 -0600 From: Crystal Wood To: j.ne@posteo.net Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski , imx@lists.linux.dev, Madhavan Srinivasan , Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , Christophe Leroy , Naveen N Rao , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Damien Le Moal , Niklas Cassel , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Lee Jones , Vinod Koul , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Bjorn Helgaas , =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=2E_Neusch=E4fer?= , Wim Van Sebroeck , Guenter Roeck , Mark Brown , Miquel Raynal , Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Li Yang , John Ogness Message-ID: References: <20250207-ppcyaml-v2-0-8137b0c42526@posteo.net> <20250207-ppcyaml-v2-9-8137b0c42526@posteo.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: j.ne@posteo.net, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, krzk@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, maddy@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, naveen@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, dlemoal@kernel.org, cassel@kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, lee@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, bhelgaas@google.com, j.neuschaefer@gmx.net, wim@linux-watchdog.org, linux@roeck-us.net, broonie@kernel.org, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at, vigneshr@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, leoyang.li@nxp.com, john.ogness@linutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: oss@buserror.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Report: * -15 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: Convert fsl,elbc to YAML X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 06 Jul 2022 17:57:39 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on baldur.buserror.net) On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 02:31:35PM -0600, Crystal Wood wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 10:30:26PM +0100, J. Neuschäfer via B4 Relay wrote: > > + simple-periph@2,0 { > > + compatible = "fsl,elbc-gpcm-uio"; > > + reg = <0x2 0x0 0x10000>; > > + elbc-gpcm-br = <0xfd810800>; > > + elbc-gpcm-or = <0xffff09f7>; > > + }; > > I know this isn't new, but... since we're using this as an example, > where is the documentation for this fsl,elbc-gpcm-uio and > elbc-gpcm-br/or? What exactly is a simple-periph? > > There are no in-tree device trees that use this either. The bcsr > node was actually a much more normal example, despite that particular > platform having been removed. There are other bcsr nodes that still > exist that could be used instead. OK, I noticed patch 10 after I sent this :-P Seems I didn't like it too much when it was new either: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/9/530 And it's still a bad example for how GPCM devices on this bus should normally be represented. -Crystal